BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Peter Jonsson

Peter Jonsson appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Computational ComplexityArtificial IntelligenceData Structures and Algorithmsmath.LODiscrete MathematicsLogic in Computer Science

Catalog footprint

What is connected

14works
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

14 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Almost Consistent Systems of Linear Equations

Checking whether a system of linear equations is consistent is a basic computational problem with ubiquitous applications. When dealing with inconsistent systems, one may seek an assignment that minimizes the number of unsatisfied equations. This problem is NP-hard and UGC-hard to approximate within any constant even for two-variable equations over the two-element field. We study this problem from the point of view of parameterized complexity, with the parameter being the number of unsatisfied equations. We consider equations defined over Euclidean domains - a family of commutative rings that generalize finite and infinite fields including the rationals, the ring of integers, and many other structures. We show that if every equation contains at most two variables, the problem is fixed-parameter tractable. This generalizes many eminent graph separation problems such as Bipartization, Multiway Cut and Multicut parameterized by the size of the cutset. To complement this, we show that the problem is W[1]-hard when three or more variables are allowed in an equation, as well as for many commutative rings that are not Euclidean domains. On the technical side, we introduce the notion of important balanced subgraphs, generalizing important separators of Marx [Theor. Comput. Sci. 2006] to the setting of biased graphs. Furthermore, we use recent results on parameterized MinCSP [Kim et al., SODA 2021] to efficiently solve a generalization of Multicut with disjunctive cut requests.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

The Reducts of the Homogeneous Binary Branching C-relation

Let (L;C) be the (up to isomorphism unique) countable homogeneous structure carrying a binary branching C-relation. We study the reducts of (L;C), i.e., the structures with domain L that are first-order definable in (L;C). We show that up to existential interdefinability, there are finitely many such reducts. This implies that there are finitely many reducts up to first-order interdefinability, thus confirming a conjecture of Simon Thomas for the special case of (L;C). We also study the endomorphism monoids of such reducts and show that they fall into four categories.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Constraint Satisfaction and Semilinear Expansions of Addition over the Rationals and the Reals

A semilinear relation is a finite union of finite intersections of open and closed half-spaces over, for instance, the reals, the rationals, or the integers. Semilinear relations have been studied in connection with algebraic geometry, automata theory, and spatiotemporal reasoning. We consider semilinear relations over the rationals and the reals. Under this assumption, the computational complexity of the constraint satisfaction problem (CSP) is known for all finite sets containing R+={(x,y,z) | x+y=z}, <=, and {1}. These problems correspond to expansions of the linear programming feasibility problem. We generalise this result and fully determine the complexity for all finite sets of semilinear relations containing R+. This is accomplished in part by introducing an algorithm, based on computing affine hulls, which solves a new class of semilinear CSPs in polynomial time. We further analyse the complexity of linear optimisation over the solution set and the existence of integer solutions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Constraint Satisfaction Problems around Skolem Arithmetic

We study interactions between Skolem Arithmetic and certain classes of Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSPs). We revisit results of Glass er et al. in the context of CSPs and settle the major open question from that paper, finding a certain satisfaction problem on circuits to be decidable. This we prove using the decidability of Skolem Arithmetic. We continue by studying first-order expansions of Skolem Arithmetic without constants, (N;*), where * indicates multiplication, as CSPs. We find already here a rich landscape of problems with non-trivial instances that are in P as well as those that are NP-complete.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

A Refined View of Causal Graphs and Component Sizes: SP-Closed Graph Classes and Beyond

The causal graph of a planning instance is an important tool for planning both in practice and in theory. The theoretical studies of causal graphs have largely analysed the computational complexity of planning for instances where the causal graph has a certain structure, often in combination with other parameters like the domain size of the variables. Chen and Gimand#233;nez ignored even the structure and considered only the size of the weakly connected components. They proved that planning is tractable if the components are bounded by a constant and otherwise intractable. Their intractability result was, however, conditioned by an assumption from parameterised complexity theory that has no known useful relationship with the standard complexity classes. We approach the same problem from the perspective of standard complexity classes, and prove that planning is NP-hard for classes with unbounded components under an additional restriction we refer to as SP-closed. We then argue that most NP-hardness theorems for causal graphs are difficult to apply and, thus, prove a more general result; even if the component sizes grow slowly and the class is not densely populated with graphs, planning still cannot be tractable unless the polynomial hierachy collapses. Both these results still hold when restricted to the class of acyclic causal graphs. We finally give a partial characterization of the borderline between NP-hard and NP-intermediate classes, giving further insight into the problem.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Algorithms and Limits for Compact Plan Representations

Compact representations of objects is a common concept in computer science. Automated planning can be viewed as a case of this concept: a planning instance is a compact implicit representation of a graph and the problem is to find a path (a plan) in this graph. While the graphs themselves are represented compactly as planning instances, the paths are usually represented explicitly as sequences of actions. Some cases are known where the plans always have compact representations, for example, using macros. We show that these results do not extend to the general case, by proving a number of bounds for compact representations of plans under various criteria, like efficient sequential or random access of actions. In addition to this, we show that our results have consequences for what can be gained from reformulating planning into some other problem. As a contrast to this we also prove a number of positive results, demonstrating restricted cases where plans do have useful compact representations, as well as proving that macro plans have favourable access properties. Our results are finally discussed in relation to other relevant contexts.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Relating the Time Complexity of Optimization Problems in Light of the Exponential-Time Hypothesis

Obtaining lower bounds for NP-hard problems has for a long time been an active area of research. Recent algebraic techniques introduced by Jonsson et al. (SODA 2013) show that the time complexity of the parameterized SAT($\cdot$) problem correlates to the lattice of strong partial clones. With this ordering they isolated a relation $R$ such that SAT($R$) can be solved at least as fast as any other NP-hard SAT($\cdot$) problem. In this paper we extend this method and show that such languages also exist for the max ones problem (MaxOnes($Γ$)) and the Boolean valued constraint satisfaction problem over finite-valued constraint languages (VCSP($Δ$)). With the help of these languages we relate MaxOnes and VCSP to the exponential time hypothesis in several different ways.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

A Complete Parameterized Complexity Analysis of Bounded Planning

The propositional planning problem is a notoriously difficult computational problem, which remains hard even under strong syntactical and structural restrictions. Given its difficulty it becomes natural to study planning in the context of parameterized complexity. In this paper we continue the work initiated by Downey, Fellows and Stege on the parameterized complexity of planning with respect to the parameter "length of the solution plan." We provide a complete classification of the parameterized complexity of the planning problem under two of the most prominent syntactical restrictions, i.e., the so called PUBS restrictions introduced by Baeckstroem and Nebel and restrictions on the number of preconditions and effects as introduced by Bylander. We also determine which of the considered fixed-parameter tractable problems admit a polynomial kernel and which don't.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Parameterized Complexity and Kernel Bounds for Hard Planning Problems

The propositional planning problem is a notoriously difficult computational problem. Downey et al. (1999) initiated the parameterized analysis of planning (with plan length as the parameter) and Bäckström et al. (2012) picked up this line of research and provided an extensive parameterized analysis under various restrictions, leaving open only one stubborn case. We continue this work and provide a full classification. In particular, we show that the case when actions have no preconditions and at most $e$ postconditions is fixed-parameter tractable if $e\leq 2$ and W[1]-complete otherwise. We show fixed-parameter tractability by a reduction to a variant of the Steiner Tree problem; this problem has been shown fixed-parameter tractable by Guo et al. (2007). If a problem is fixed-parameter tractable, then it admits a polynomial-time self-reduction to instances whose input size is bounded by a function of the parameter, called the kernel. For some problems, this function is even polynomial which has desirable computational implications. Recent research in parameterized complexity has focused on classifying fixed-parameter tractable problems on whether they admit polynomial kernels or not. We revisit all the previously obtained restrictions of planning that are fixed-parameter tractable and show that none of them admits a polynomial kernel unless the polynomial hierarchy collapses to its third level.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Essential Convexity and Complexity of Semi-Algebraic Constraints

Let Γbe a structure with a finite relational signature and a first-order definition in (R;*,+) with parameters from R, that is, a relational structure over the real numbers where all relations are semi-algebraic sets. In this article, we study the computational complexity of constraint satisfaction problem (CSP) for Γ: the problem to decide whether a given primitive positive sentence is true in Γ. We focus on those structures Γthat contain the relations \leq, {(x,y,z) | x+y=z} and {1}. Hence, all CSPs studied in this article are at least as expressive as the feasibility problem for linear programs. The central concept in our investigation is essential convexity: a relation S is essentially convex if for all a,b\inS, there are only finitely many points on the line segment between a and b that are not in S. If Γcontains a relation S that is not essentially convex and this is witnessed by rational points a,b, then we show that the CSP for Γis NP-hard. Furthermore, we characterize essentially convex relations in logical terms. This different view may open up new ways for identifying tractable classes of semi-algebraic CSPs. For instance, we show that if Γis a first-order expansion of (R;*,+), then the CSP for Γcan be solved in polynomial time if and only if all relations in Γare essentially convex (unless P=NP).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

The Complexity of Planning Revisited - A Parameterized Analysis

The early classifications of the computational complexity of planning under various restrictions in STRIPS (Bylander) and SAS+ (Baeckstroem and Nebel) have influenced following research in planning in many ways. We go back and reanalyse their subclasses, but this time using the more modern tool of parameterized complexity analysis. This provides new results that together with the old results give a more detailed picture of the complexity landscape. We demonstrate separation results not possible with standard complexity theory, which contributes to explaining why certain cases of planning have seemed simpler in practice than theory has predicted. In particular, we show that certain restrictions of practical interest are tractable in the parameterized sense of the term, and that a simple heuristic is sufficient to make a well-known partial-order planner exploit this fact.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Min CSP on Four Elements: Moving Beyond Submodularity

We report new results on the complexity of the valued constraint satisfaction problem (VCSP). Under the unique games conjecture, the approximability of finite-valued VCSP is fairly well-understood. However, there is yet no characterisation of VCSPs that can be solved exactly in polynomial time. This is unsatisfactory, since such results are interesting from a combinatorial optimisation perspective; there are deep connections with, for instance, submodular and bisubmodular minimisation. We consider the Min and Max CSP problems (i.e. where the cost functions only attain values in {0,1}) over four-element domains and identify all tractable fragments. Similar classifications were previously known for two- and three-element domains. In the process, we introduce a new class of tractable VCSPs based on a generalisation of submodularity. We also extend and modify a graph-based technique by Kolmogorov and Zivny (originally introduced by Takhanov) for efficiently obtaining hardness results in our setting. This allow us to prove the result without relying on computer-assisted case analyses (which otherwise are fairly common when studying the complexity and approximability of VCSPs.) The hardness results are further simplified by the introduction of powerful reduction techniques.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2008arXiv

Approximability of Integer Programming with Generalised Constraints

We study a family of problems, called \prob{Maximum Solution}, where the objective is to maximise a linear goal function over the feasible integer assignments to a set of variables subject to a set of constraints. When the domain is Boolean (i.e. restricted to $\{0,1\}$), the maximum solution problem is identical to the well-studied \prob{Max Ones} problem, and the approximability is completely understood for all restrictions on the underlying constraints [Khanna et al., SIAM J. Comput., 30 (2001), pp. 1863-1920]. We continue this line of research by considering domains containing more than two elements. We present two main results: a complete classification for the approximability of all maximal constraint languages over domains of cardinality at most 4, and a complete classification of the approximability of the problem when the set of allowed constraints contains all permutation constraints. Under the assumption that a conjecture due to Szczepara holds, we give a complete classification for all maximal constraint languages. These classes of languages are well-studied in universal algebra and computer science; they have, for instance, been considered in connection with machine learning and constraint satisfaction. Our results are proved by using algebraic results from clone theory and the results indicates that this approach is very powerful for classifying the approximability of certain optimisation problems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access