BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Peter Eades

Peter Eades contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Data Structures and AlgorithmsHuman-Computer InteractionSocial and Information Networks

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Shape-Faithful Graph Drawings

Shape-based metrics measure how faithfully a drawing D represents the structure of a graph G, using the proximity graph S of D. While some limited graph classes admit proximity drawings (i.e., optimally shape-faithful drawings, where S = G), algorithms for shape-faithful drawings of general graphs have not been investigated. In this paper, we present the first study for shape-faithful drawings of general graphs. First, we conduct extensive comparison experiments for popular graph layouts using the shape-based metrics, and examine the properties of highly shape-faithful drawings. Then, we present ShFR and ShSM, algorithms for shape-faithful drawings based on force-directed and stress-based algorithms, by introducing new proximity forces/stress. Experiments show that ShFR and ShSM obtain significant improvement over FR (Fruchterman-Reingold) and SM (Stress Majorization), on average 12% and 35% respectively, on shape-based metrics.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

A Study of Mental Maps in Immersive Network Visualization

The visualization of a network influences the quality of the mental map that the viewer develops to understand the network. In this study, we investigate the effects of a 3D immersive visualization environment compared to a traditional 2D desktop environment on the comprehension of a network's structure. We compare the two visualization environments using three tasks--interpreting network structure, memorizing a set of nodes, and identifying the structural changes--commonly used for evaluating the quality of a mental map in network visualization. The results show that participants were able to interpret network structure more accurately when viewing the network in an immersive environment, particularly for larger networks. However, we found that 2D visualizations performed better than immersive visualization for tasks that required spatial memory.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

New Quality Metrics for Dynamic Graph Drawing

In this paper, we present new quality metrics for dynamic graph drawings. Namely, we present a new framework for change faithfulness metrics for dynamic graph drawings, which compare the ground truth change in dynamic graphs and the geometric change in drawings. More specifically, we present two specific instances, cluster change faithfulness metrics and distance change faithfulness metrics. We first validate the effectiveness of our new metrics using deformation experiments. Then we compare various graph drawing algorithms using our metrics. Our experiments confirm that the best cluster (resp. distance) faithful graph drawing algorithms are also cluster (resp. distance) change faithful.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access