BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Paweł Parys

Paweł Parys contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Formal Languages and Automata TheoryLogic in Computer ScienceComputational ComplexityComputer Science and Game Theory

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Generalised Quantifiers Based on Rabin-Mostowski Index

In this work we introduce new generalised quantifiers which allow us to express the Rabin-Mostowski index of automata. Our main results study expressive power and decidability of the monadic second-order (MSO) logic extended with these quantifiers. We study these problems in the realm of both $ω$-words and infinite trees. As it turns out, the pictures in these two cases are very different. In the case of $ω$-words the new quantifiers can be effectively expressed in pure MSO logic. In contrast, in the case of infinite trees, addition of these quantifiers leads to an undecidable formalism. To realise index-quantifier elimination, we consider the extension of MSO by game quantifiers. As a tool, we provide a specific quantifier-elimination procedure for them. Moreover, we introduce a novel construction of transducers realising strategies in $ω$-regular games with monadic parameters.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Unboundedness for Recursion Schemes: A Simpler Type System

Decidability of the problems of unboundedness and simultaneous unboundedness (aka. the diagonal problem) for higher-order recursion schemes was established by Clemente, Parys, Salvati, and Walukiewicz (2016). Then a procedure of optimal complexity was presented by Parys (2017); this procedure used a complicated type system, involving multiple flags and markers. We present here a simpler and much more intuitive type system serving the same purpose. We prove that this type system allows to solve the unboundedness problem for a widely considered subclass of recursion schemes, called safe schemes. For unsafe recursion schemes we only have soundness of the type system: if one can establish a type derivation claiming that a recursion scheme is unbounded then it is indeed unbounded. Completeness of the type system for unsafe recursion schemes is left as an open question. Going further, we discuss an extension of the type system that allows to handle the simultaneous unboundedness problem. We also design and implement an algorithm that fully automatically checks unboundedness of a given recursion scheme, completing in a short time for a wide variety of inputs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Bisimulation Finiteness of Pushdown Systems Is Elementary

We show that in case a pushdown system is bisimulation equivalent to a finite system, there is already a bisimulation equivalent finite system whose size is elementarily bounded in the description size of the pushdown system. As a consequence we obtain that it is elementarily decidable if a given pushdown system is bisimulation equivalent to some finite system. This improves a previously best-known ACKERMANN upper bound for this problem.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Compositionality of the MSO+U Logic

We prove that the MSO+U logic is compositional in the following sense: whether an MSO+U formula holds in a tree T depends only on MSO+U-definable properties of the root of T and of subtrees of T starting directly below the root. Another kind of compositionality follows: every MSO+U formula whose all free variables range only over finite sets of nodes (in particular, whose all free variables are first-order) can be rewritten into an MSO formula having access to properties of subtrees definable by MSO+U sentences (without free variables).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Higher-Order Nonemptiness Step by Step

We show a new simple algorithm that checks whether a given higher-order grammar generates a nonempty language of trees. The algorithm amounts to a procedure that transforms a grammar of order n to a grammar of order n-1, preserving nonemptiness, and increasing the size only exponentially. After repeating the procedure n times, we obtain a grammar of order 0, whose nonemptiness can be easily checked. Since the size grows exponentially at each step, the overall complexity is n-EXPTIME, which is known to be optimal. More precisely, the transformation (and hence the whole algorithm) is linear in the size of the grammar, assuming that the arity of employed nonterminals is bounded by a constant. The same algorithm allows to check whether an infinite tree generated by a higher-order recursion scheme is accepted by an alternating safety (or reachability) automaton, because this question can be reduced to the nonemptiness problem by taking a product of the recursion scheme with the automaton. A proof of correctness of the algorithm is formalised in the proof assistant Coq. Our transformation is motivated by a similar transformation of Asada and Kobayashi (2020) changing a word grammar of order n to a tree grammar of order n-1. The step-by-step approach can be opposed to previous algorithms solving the nonemptiness problem "in one step", being compulsorily more complicated.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2018arXiv

Universal trees grow inside separating automata: Quasi-polynomial lower bounds for parity games

Several distinct techniques have been proposed to design quasi-polynomial algorithms for solving parity games since the breakthrough result of Calude, Jain, Khoussainov, Li, and Stephan (2017): play summaries, progress measures and register games. We argue that all those techniques can be viewed as instances of the separation approach to solving parity games, a key technical component of which is constructing (explicitly or implicitly) an automaton that separates languages of words encoding plays that are (decisively) won by either of the two players. Our main technical result is a quasi-polynomial lower bound on the size of such separating automata that nearly matches the current best upper bounds. This forms a barrier that all existing approaches must overcome in the ongoing quest for a polynomial-time algorithm for solving parity games. The key and fundamental concept that we introduce and study is a universal ordered tree. The technical highlights are a quasi-polynomial lower bound on the size of universal ordered trees and a proof that every separating safety automaton has a universal tree hidden in its state space.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access