Researcher profile

Paul I. Dubovan

Paul I. Dubovan contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
1topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Model-based determination of the synchronization delay between MRI and trajectory data

Purpose: Real time monitoring of dynamic magnetic fields has recently become a commercially available option for measuring MRI k-space trajectories and magnetic fields induced by eddy currents in real time. However, for accurate image reconstructions, sub-microsecond synchronization between the MRI and trajectory data is required. In this work, we introduce a new model-based algorithm to automatically perform this synchronization using only the MRI and trajectory data. Methods: The algorithm works by enforcing consistency between the MRI data, trajectory data, and receiver sensitivity profiles by iteratively alternating between convex optimizations for (a) the image and (b) the synchronization delay. A healthy human subject was scanned at 7T using a transmit-receive coil with integrated field probes using both single shot spiral and echo-planar imaging (EPI), and reconstructions with various synchronization delays were compared to the result of the proposed algorithm. The accuracy of the algorithm was also investigated using simulations, where the acquisition delays for simulated acquisitions were determined using the proposed algorithm and compared to the known ground truth. Results: In the in vivo scans, the proposed algorithm minimized artefacts related to synchronization delay for both spiral and EPI acquisitions, and the computation time required was less than 30 seconds. The simulations demonstrated accuracy to within tens of nanoseconds. Conclusion: The proposed algorithm can automatically determine synchronization delays between MRI data and trajectories measured using a field probe system.

preprint2021arXiv

Characterization and Correction of Time-Varying Eddy Currents for Diffusion MRI

Purpose: Diffusion MRI (dMRI) suffers from eddy currents induced by strong diffusion gradients, which introduce artefacts that can impair subsequent diffusion metric analysis. Existing retrospective correction techniques that correct for diffusion gradient induced eddy currents do not account for eddy current decay, which is generally effective for traditional Pulsed Gradient Spin Echo (PGSE) diffusion encoding. However, these techniques do not necessarily apply to advanced forms of dMRI that require substantial gradient slewing, such as Oscillating Gradient Spin Echo (OGSE). Methods: An in-house algorithm (TVEDDY), that for the first time retrospectively models eddy current decay, was tested on PGSE and OGSE brain images acquired at 7T. Correction performance was compared to conventional correction methods by evaluating the mean-squared error (MSE) between diffusion-weighted images acquired with opposite polarity diffusion gradients. As a ground truth comparison, images were corrected using field dynamics up to third order in space measured using a field monitoring system. Results: Time-varying eddy currents were observed for OGSE, which introduced blurring that was not reduced using the traditional approach but was diminished considerably with TVEDDY and model-based reconstruction. No MSE difference was observed between the conventional approach and TVEDDY for PGSE, but for OGSE TVEDDY resulted in significantly lower MSE than the conventional approach. The field-monitoring-informed model-based reconstruction had the lowest MSE for both PGSE and OGSE. Conclusion: This work establishes that it is possible to estimate time-varying eddy currents from the diffusion data itself, which provides substantial image quality improvements for gradient-intensive dMRI acquisitions like OGSE.