Source author record

Paul B. Eskridge

Paul B. Eskridge appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

astro-ph

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works

1topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2004arXiv

Quantifying Bar Strength: Morphology Meets Methodology

A set of objective bar-classification methods have been applied to the Ohio State Bright Spiral Galaxy Survey (Eskridge et al. 2002). Bivariate comparisons between methods show that all methods agree in a statistical sense. Thus the distribution of bar strengths in a sample of galaxies can be robustly determined. There are very substantial outliers in all bivariate comparisons. Examination of the outliers reveals that the scatter in the bivariate comparisons correlates with galaxy morphology. Thus multiple measures of bar strength provide a means of studying the range of physical properties of galaxy bars in an objective statistical sense.

preprint1997arXiv

The Nature of the X-Ray Point Source in the Bar of NGC 6822

We have analysed archival ROSAT PSPC and Einstein HRI data for the x-ray point source in the bar of NGC 6822. The source decreased in x-ray flux by at least half an order of magnitude in the 13 years between the HRI and PSPC observations. It has a PSPC flux of f_X = 8 x 10E-14 erg/cm^2/s, giving L_X = 2.4 x 10E36 erg/s for a distance of 500 kpc. The source appears to be related to the optical emission-line object Ho 12. It is unclear if Ho 12 is an HII region or a supernova remnant, although the latter interpretation is better supported by the available optical data. The x-rays are unlikely to be direct emission from a supernova remnant, due to the observed strong x-ray variability. The x-ray spectrum of the source is very soft. Acceptable fits are found for either a Raymond-Smith thermal model with kT = 0.56 keV, or a blackbody model with kT = 0.06 keV. The latter model would place the source amongst the class of Super-Soft x-ray sources first found in the Magellanic Clouds. If the thermal model is correct, the source appears similar to Galactic and Magellanic Cloud stellar-mass black hole binary candidates. We have identified a list of potential optical counterparts from published photometry. However, for either model discussed above, we expect the apparent magnitude of the optical counterpart to be in the range 21.5 < V < 24.0. Thus the optical counterpart may be below the limit of published photometry.

preprint1996arXiv

X-Ray Emission from M32: X-Ray Binaries or a micro-AGN?

We have analysed archival {\it ROSAT} PSPC data for M32 in order to study the x-ray emission from this nearest elliptical galaxy. We fit spectra from three long exposures with Raymond-Smith, thermal bremsstrahlung, and power-law models. All models give excellent fits. The thermal fits have kT$\approx$4 keV, the Raymond-Smith iron abundance is $0.4^{+0.7}_{-0.3}$ Solar, the power-law fit has $α$=1.6$\pm$0.1, and all fits have $N_H$ consistent with the Galactic column. The source is centered on M32 to an accuracy of 9$''$, and unresolved at 27$''$ FWHM ($\sim$90 pc). M32 is x-ray variable by a factor of 3--5 on timescales of a decade down to minutes, with evidence for a possible period of $\sim$1.3 days. There are two plausible interpretations for these results: 1) Emission due to low-mass x-ray binaries; 2) Emission due to accretion onto a massive central black hole. Both of these possibilities are supported by arguments based on previous studies of M32 and other old stellar systems; the {\it ROSAT} PSPC data do not allow us to unambiguously choose between them. Observations with the {\it ROSAT} HRI and with {\it ASCA} are required to determine which of these two very different physical models is correct.