BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Patrizio Angelini

Patrizio Angelini contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Discrete MathematicsComputational GeometryData Structures and Algorithmsmath.COHuman-Computer Interaction

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
9works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

9 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

On Upward-Planar L-Drawings of Graphs

In an upward-planar L-drawing of a directed acyclic graph (DAG) each edge $e$ is represented as a polyline composed of a vertical segment with its lowest endpoint at the tail of $e$ and of a horizontal segment ending at the head of $e$. Distinct edges may overlap, but not cross. Recently, upward-planar L-drawings have been studied for $st$-graphs, i.e., planar DAGs with a single source $s$ and a single sink $t$ containing an edge directed from $s$ to $t$. It is known that a plane $st$-graph, i.e., an embedded $st$-graph in which the edge $(s,t)$ is incident to the outer face, admits an upward-planar L-drawing if and only if it admits a bitonic $st$-ordering, which can be tested in linear time. We study upward-planar L-drawings of DAGs that are not necessarily $st$-graphs. On the combinatorial side, we show that a plane DAG admits an upward-planar L-drawing if and only if it is a subgraph of a plane $st$-graph admitting a bitonic $st$-ordering. This allows us to show that not every tree with a fixed bimodal embedding admits an upward-planar L-drawing. Moreover, we prove that any acyclic cactus with a single source (or a single sink) admits an upward-planar L-drawing, which respects a given outerplanar embedding if there are no transitive edges. On the algorithmic side, we consider DAGs with a single source (or a single sink). We give linear-time testing algorithms for these DAGs in two cases: (i) when the drawing must respect a prescribed embedding and (ii) when no restriction is given on the embedding, but it is biconnected and series-parallel.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Proceedings of the 30th International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2022)

This is the arXiv index for the electronic proceedings of GD 2022, which is held at the Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan, on September 13 - 16, 2022. It contains the peer-reviewed and revised accepted papers with an optional appendix. Proceedings (without appendices) are also to be published by Springer in the Lecture Notes in Computer Science series.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

RAC Drawings of Graphs with Low Degree

Motivated by cognitive experiments providing evidence that large crossing-angles do not impair the readability of a graph drawing, RAC (Right Angle Crossing) drawings were introduced to address the problem of producing readable representations of non-planar graphs by supporting the optimal case in which all crossings form 90° angles. In this work, we make progress on the problem of finding RAC drawings of graphs of low degree. In this context, a long-standing open question asks whether all degree-3 graphs admit straight-line RAC drawings. This question has been positively answered for the Hamiltonian degree-3 graphs. We improve on this result by extending to the class of 3-edge-colorable degree-3 graphs. When each edge is allowed to have one bend, we prove that degree-4 graphs admit such RAC drawings, a result which was previously known only for degree-3 graphs. Finally, we show that 7-edge-colorable degree-7 graphs admit RAC drawings with two bends per edge. This improves over the previous result on degree-6 graphs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Recognizing Map Graphs of Bounded Treewidth

A map graph is a graph admitting a representation in which vertices are nations on a spherical map and edges are shared curve segments or points between nations. We present an explicit fixed-parameter tractable algorithm for recognizing map graphs parameterized by treewidth. The algorithm has time complexity that is linear in the size of the graph and, if the input is a yes-instance, it reports a certificate in the form of a so-called witness. Furthermore, this result is developed within a more general algorithmic framework that allows to test, for any $k$, if the input graph admits a $k$-map (where at most $k$ nations meet at a common point) or a hole-free~$k$-map (where each point of the sphere is covered by at least one nation). We point out that, although bounding the treewidth of the input graph also bounds the size of its largest clique, the latter alone does not seem to be a strong enough structural limitation to obtain an efficient time complexity. In fact, while the largest clique in a $k$-map graph is $\lfloor 3k/2 \rfloor$, the recognition of $k$-map graphs is still open for any fixed $k \ge 5$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

$2$-Layer $k$-Planar Graphs: Density, Crossing Lemma, Relationships, and Pathwidth

The $2$-layer drawing model is a well-established paradigm to visualize bipartite graphs. Several beyond-planar graph classes have been studied under this model. Surprisingly, however, the fundamental class of $k$-planar graphs has been considered only for $k=1$ in this context. We provide several contributions that address this gap in the literature. First, we show tight density bounds for the classes of $2$-layer $k$-planar graphs with $k\in\{2,3,4,5\}$. Based on these results, we provide a Crossing Lemma for $2$-layer $k$-planar graphs, which then implies a general density bound for $2$-layer $k$-planar graphs. We prove this bound to be almost optimal with a corresponding lower bound construction. Finally, we study relationships between $k$-planarity and $h$-quasiplanarity in the $2$-layer model and show that $2$-layer $k$-planar graphs have pathwidth at most $k+1$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Extending Partial Orthogonal Drawings

We study the planar orthogonal drawing style within the framework of partial representation extension. Let $(G,H,Γ_H )$ be a partial orthogonal drawing, i.e., G is a graph, $H\subseteq G$ is a subgraph and $Γ_H$ is a planar orthogonal drawing of H. We show that the existence of an orthogonal drawing $Γ_G$ of $G$ that extends $Γ_H$ can be tested in linear time. If such a drawing exists, then there also is one that uses $O(|V(H)|)$ bends per edge. On the other hand, we show that it is NP-complete to find an extension that minimizes the number of bends or has a fixed number of bends per edge.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

On Mixed Linear Layouts of Series-Parallel Graphs

A mixed s-stack q-queue layout of a graph consists of a linear order of its vertices and of a partition of its edges into s stacks and q queues, such that no two edges in the same stack cross and no two edges in the same queue nest. In 1992, Heath and Rosenberg conjectured that every planar graph admits a mixed 1-stack 1-queue layout. Recently, Pupyrev disproved this conjectured by demonstrating a planar partial 3-tree that does not admit a 1-stack 1-queue layout. In this note, we strengthen Pupyrev's result by showing that the conjecture does not hold even for 2-trees, also known as series-parallel graphs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Planar L-Drawings of Bimodal Graphs

In a planar L-drawing of a directed graph (digraph) each edge e is represented as a polyline composed of a vertical segment starting at the tail of e and a horizontal segment ending at the head of e. Distinct edges may overlap, but not cross. Our main focus is on bimodal graphs, i.e., digraphs admitting a planar embedding in which the incoming and outgoing edges around each vertex are contiguous. We show that every plane bimodal graph without 2-cycles admits a planar L-drawing. This includes the class of upward-plane graphs. Finally, outerplanar digraphs admit a planar L-drawing - although they do not always have a bimodal embedding - but not necessarily with an outerplanar embedding.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Simple $k$-Planar Graphs are Simple $(k+1)$-Quasiplanar

A simple topological graph is $k$-quasiplanar ($k\geq 2$) if it contains no $k$ pairwise crossing edges, and $k$-planar if no edge is crossed more than $k$ times. In this paper, we explore the relationship between $k$-planarity and $k$-quasiplanarity to show that, for $k \geq 2$, every $k$-planar simple topological graph can be transformed into a $(k+1)$-quasiplanar simple topological graph.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access