Researcher profile

Pascal Koiran

Pascal Koiran contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2024arXiv

On the uniqueness and computation of commuting extensions

A tuple (Z_1,...,Z_p) of matrices of size r is said to be a commuting extension of a tuple (A_1,...,A_p) of matrices of size n <r if the Z_i pairwise commute and each A_i sits in the upper left corner of a block decomposition of Z_i. This notion was discovered and rediscovered in several contexts including algebraic complexity theory (in Strassen&#39;s work on tensor rank), in numerical analysis for the construction of cubature formulas and in quantum mechanics for the study of computational methods and the study of the so-called &#34;quantum Zeno dynamics.&#34; Commuting extensions have also attracted the attention of the linear algebra community. In this paper we present 3 types of results: (i) Theorems on the uniqueness of commuting extensions for three matrices or more. (ii) Algorithms for the computation of commuting extensions of minimal size. These algorithms work under the same assumptions as our uniqueness theorems. They are applicable up to r=4n/3, and are apparently the first provably efficient algorithms for this problem applicable beyond r=n+1. (iii) A genericity theorem showing that our algorithms and uniqueness theorems can be applied to a wide range of input matrices.

preprint2020arXiv

Computing the multilinear factors of lacunary polynomials without heights

We present a deterministic algorithm which computes the multilinear factors of multivariate lacunary polynomials over number fields. Its complexity is polynomial in $\ell^n$ where $\ell$ is the lacunary size of the input polynomial and $n$ its number of variables, that is in particular polynomial in the logarithm of its degree. We also provide a randomized algorithm for the same problem of complexity polynomial in $\ell$ and $n$. Over other fields of characteristic zero and finite fields of large characteristic, our algorithms compute the multilinear factors having at least three monomials of multivariate polynomials. Lower bounds are provided to explain the limitations of our algorithm. As a by-product, we also design polynomial-time deterministic polynomial identity tests for families of polynomials which were not known to admit any. Our results are based on so-called Gap Theorem which reduce high-degree factorization to repeated low-degree factorizations. While previous algorithms used Gap Theorems expressed in terms of the heights of the coefficients, our Gap Theorems only depend on the exponents of the polynomials. This makes our algorithms more elementary and general, and faster in most cases.

preprint2020arXiv

On tensor rank and commuting matrices

Obtaining superlinear lower bounds on tensor rank is a major open problem in complexity theory. In this paper we propose a generalization of the approach used by Strassen in the proof of his 3n/2 border rank lower bound. Our approach revolves around a problem on commuting matrices: Given matrices Z_1,...,Z_p of size n and an integer r>n, are there commuting matrices Z&#39;_1,...,Z&#39;_p of size r such that every Z_k is embedded as a submatrix in the top-left corner of Z&#39;_k? As one of our main results, we show that this question always has a positive answer for r larger than rank(T)+n, where T denotes the tensor with slices Z_1,..,Z_p. Taking the contrapositive, if one can show for some specific matrices Z_1,...,Z_p and a specific integer r that this question has a negative answer, this yields the lower bound rank(T) > r-n. There is a little bit of slack in the above rank(T)+n bound, but we also provide a number of exact characterizations of tensor rank and symmetric rank, for ordinary and symmetric tensors, over the fields of real and complex numbers. Each of these characterizations points to a corresponding variation on the above approach. In order to explain how Strassen&#39;s theorem fits within this framework we also provide a self-contained proof of his lower bound.

preprint2010arXiv

Shallow Circuits with High-Powered Inputs

A polynomial identity testing algorithm must determine whether an input polynomial (given for instance by an arithmetic circuit) is identically equal to 0. In this paper, we show that a deterministic black-box identity testing algorithm for (high-degree) univariate polynomials would imply a lower bound on the arithmetic complexity of the permanent. The lower bounds that are known to follow from derandomization of (low-degree) multivariate identity testing are weaker. To obtain our lower bound it would be sufficient to derandomize identity testing for polynomials of a very specific norm: sums of products of sparse polynomials with sparse coefficients. This observation leads to new versions of the Shub-Smale tau-conjecture on integer roots of univariate polynomials. In particular, we show that a lower bound for the permanent would follow if one could give a good enough bound on the number of real roots of sums of products of sparse polynomials (Descartes&#39; rule of signs gives such a bound for sparse polynomials and products thereof). In this third version of our paper we show that the same lower bound would follow even if one could only prove a slightly superpolynomial upper bound on the number of real roots. This is a consequence of a new result on reduction to depth 4 for arithmetic circuits which we establish in a companion paper. We also show that an even weaker bound on the number of real roots would suffice to obtain a lower bound on the size of depth 4 circuits computing the permanent.