Source author record

Parviz Sahandi

Parviz Sahandi appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

math.AC

Catalog footprint

What is connected

6works

1topics

3close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2014arXiv

Characterizations of graded Prüfer $\star$-multiplication domains

Let $R=\bigoplus_{α\inΓ}R_α$ be a graded integral domain graded by an arbitrary grading torsionless monoid $Γ$, and $\star$ be a semistar operation on $R$. In this paper we define and study the graded integral domain analogue of $\star$-Nagata and Kronecker function rings of $R$ with respect to $\star$. We say that $R$ is a graded Prüfer $\star$-multiplication domain if each nonzero finitely generated homogeneous ideal of $R$ is $\star_f$-invertible. Using $\star$-Nagata and Kronecker function rings, we give several different equivalent conditions for $R$ to be a graded Prüfer $\star$-multiplication domain. In particular we give new characterizations for a graded integral domain, to be a P$v$MD.

preprint2013arXiv

On graded Gorenstein injective dimension

There are nice relations between graded homological dimensions and ordinary homological dimensions. We study the Gorenstein injective dimension of a complex of graded modules denoted by $^*\Gid$, and derive its properties. In particular we prove the Chouinard's like formula for $^*\Gid$, and compare it with the usual Gorenstein injective dimension.

preprint2011arXiv

On quasi-Prüfer and UM$t$ domains

In this note we show that an integral domain $D$ of finite $w$-dimension is a quasi-Prüfer domain if and only if each overring of $D$ is a $w$-Jaffard domain. Similar characterizations of quasi-Prüfer domains are given by replacing $w$-Jaffard domain by $w$-stably strong S-domain, and $w$-strong S-domain. We also give new characterizations of UM$t$ domains.

preprint2011arXiv

W-Jaffard domains in pullbacks

In this paper we study the class of $w$-Jaffard domains in pullback constructions, and give new examples of these domains. In particular we give examples to show that the two classes of $w$-Jaffard and Jaffard domains are incomparable. As another application, we establish that for each pair of positive integers $(n,m)$ with $n+1\leq m\leq 2n+1$, there is an (integrally closed) integral domain $R$ such that $w$-$\dim(R)=n$ and $w[X]$-$\dim(R[X])=m$.

preprint2010arXiv

Depth formula via complete intersection flat dimension

We prove the depth formula, for homologically bounded complexes $X, Y$ provided that the complete intersection flat dimension of $X$ is finite and $\sup(X\utp_RY)<\infty$. In particular, let $M$ and $N$ are two $R$-modules and the complete intersection flat dimension of $M$ is finite. Then $M$ and $N$ satisfies the depth formula, provided $\Tor^R_i(M,N)=0$ for all $i\ge 1$.

preprint2010arXiv

Semistar dimension of polynomial rings and Prüfer-like domains

Let $D$ be an integral domain and $\star$ a semistar operation stable and of finite type on it. In this paper we define the semistar dimension (inequality) formula and discover their relations with $\star$-universally catenarian domains and $\star$-stably strong S-domains. As an application we give new characterizations of $\star$-quasi-Prüfer domains and UM$t$ domains in terms of dimension inequality formula (and the notions of universally catenarian domain, stably strong S-domain, strong S-domain, and Jaffard domains). We also extend Arnold's formula to the setting of semistar operations.

Institution

Affiliation not imported yet

This author record came from a source that does not expose affiliation metadata. Once the author claims the profile or we enrich the record from another provider, this section will link to the concrete institution.

Topic footprint