BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Paolo Giordani

Paolo Giordani contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
MethodologyComputation

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2010arXiv

A copula based approach to adaptive sampling

Our article is concerned with adaptive sampling schemes for Bayesian inference that update the proposal densities using previous iterates. We introduce a copula based proposal density which is made more efficient by combining it with antithetic variable sampling. We compare the copula based proposal to an adaptive proposal density based on a multivariate mixture of normals and an adaptive random walk Metropolis proposal. We also introduce a refinement of the random walk proposal which performs better for multimodal target distributions. We compare the sampling schemes using challenging but realistic models and priors applied to real data examples. The results show that for the examples studied, the adaptive independent \MH{} proposals are much more efficient than the adaptive random walk proposals and that in general the copula based proposal has the best acceptance rates and lowest inefficiencies.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Auxiliary Particle filtering within adaptive Metropolis-Hastings Sampling

Our article deals with Bayesian inference for a general state space model with the simulated likelihood computed by the particle filter. We show empirically that the partially or fully adapted particle filters can be much more efficient than the standard particle, especially when the signal to noise ratio is high. This is especially important because using the particle filter within MCMC sampling is O(T^2), where T is the sample size. We also show that an adaptive independent proposal for the unknown parameters based on a mixture of normals can be much more efficient than the usual optimal random walk methods because the simulated likelihood is not continuous in the parameters and the cost of constructing a good adaptive proposal is negligible compared to the cost of evaluating the simulated likelihood. Independent \MH proposals are also attractive because they are easy to run in parallel on multiple processors. The article also shows that the proposed \aimh sampler converges to the posterior distribution. We also show that the marginal likelihood of any state space model can be obtained in an efficient and unbiased manner by using the \pf making model comparison straightforward. Obtaining the marginal likelihood is often difficult using other methods. Finally, we prove that the simulated likelihood obtained by the auxiliary particle filter is unbiased. This result is fundamental to using the particle for MCMC sampling and is first obtained in a more abstract and difficult setting by Del Moral (2004). However, our proof is direct and will make the result accessible to readers.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access