BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Paola Spoletini

Paola Spoletini contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Logic in Computer ScienceSoftware EngineeringArtificial IntelligenceHuman-Computer InteractionMultiagent SystemsSystems and Control

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

How Do Requirements Evolve During Elicitation? An Empirical Study Combining Interviews and App Store Analysis

Requirements are elicited from the customer and other stakeholders through an iterative process of interviews, prototyping, and other interactive sessions. Then, requirements can be further extended, based on the analysis of the features of competing products available on the market. Understanding how this process takes place can help to identify the contribution of the different elicitation phases, thereby allowing requirements analysts to better distribute their resources. In this work, we empirically study in which way requirements get transformed from initial ideas into documented needs, and then evolve based on the inspiration coming from similar products. To this end, we select 30 subjects that act as requirements analysts, and we perform interview-based elicitation sessions with a fictional customer. After the sessions, the analysts produce a first set of requirements for the system. Then, they are required to search similar products in the app stores, and extend the requirements, inspired by the identified apps. The requirements documented at each step are evaluated, to assess to which extent and in which way the initial idea evolved throughout the process. Our results show that only between 30\% and 38\% of the requirements produced after the interviews include content that can be fully traced to initial customer's ideas. Furthermore, up to 42\% of the requirements inspired by the app stores cover additional features compared to the ones identified after the interviews. The results empirically show that requirements are not elicited in strict sense, but actually co-created through interviews, with analysts playing a crucial role in the process. In addition, we show evidence that app store-inspired elicitation can be particularly beneficial to complete the requirements.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Optimal by Design: Model-Driven Synthesis of Adaptation Strategies for Autonomous Systems

Many software systems have become too large and complex to be managed efficiently by human administrators, particularly when they operate in uncertain and dynamic environments and require frequent changes. Requirements-driven adaptation techniques have been proposed to endow systems with the necessary means to autonomously decide ways to satisfy their requirements. However, many current approaches rely on general-purpose languages, models and/or frameworks to design, develop and analyze autonomous systems. Unfortunately, these tools are not tailored towards the characteristics of adaptation problems in autonomous systems. In this paper, we present Optimal by Design (ObD ), a framework for model-based requirements-driven synthesis of optimal adaptation strategies for autonomous systems. ObD proposes a model (and a language) for the high-level description of the basic elements of self-adaptive systems, namely the system, capabilities, requirements and environment. Based on those elements, a Markov Decision Process (MDP) is constructed to compute the optimal strategy or the most rewarding system behaviour. Furthermore, this defines a reflex controller that can ensure timely responses to changes. One novel feature of the framework is that it benefits both from goal-oriented techniques, developed for requirement elicitation, refinement and analysis, and synthesis capabilities and extensive research around MDPs, their extensions and tools. Our preliminary evaluation results demonstrate the practicality and advantages of the framework.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Fuzzy Time in LTL

In the last years, the adoption of active systems has increased in many fields of computer science, such as databases, sensor networks, and software engineering. These systems are able to automatically react to events, by collecting information from outside and internally generating new events. However, the collection of data is often hampered by uncertainty and vagueness that can arise from the imprecision of the monitoring infrastructure, unreliable data sources, and networks. The decision making mechanism used to produce a reaction is also imprecise, and cannot be evaluated in a crisp way. It depends on the evaluation of vague temporal constraints, which are expressed on the collected data by humans. Despite fuzzy logic has been mainly conceived as a mathematical abstraction to express vagueness, no attempt has been made to fuzzify the temporal modalities. Existing fuzzy languages do not allow us to represent temporal properties, such as "almost always" and "soon". Indeed, the semantics of existing fuzzy temporal operators is based on the idea of replacing classical connectives or propositions with their fuzzy counterparts. To overcome these limitations, we propose a temporal framework, FTL (Fuzzy-time Temporal Logic), to express vagueness on time. This framework formally defines a set of fuzzy temporal modalities, which can be customized by choosing a specific semantics for the connectives. The semantics of the language is sound, and the introduced modalities respect a set of expected mutual relations. We also prove that under the assumption that all events are crisp, FTL reduces to LTL. Finally, for some of the possible fuzzy interpretations of the connectives, we identify adequate sets of temporal operators, from which it is possible to derive all the others.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

On Relaxing Metric Information in Linear Temporal Logic

Metric LTL formulas rely on the next operator to encode time distances, whereas qualitative LTL formulas use only the until operator. This paper shows how to transform any metric LTL formula M into a qualitative formula Q, such that Q is satisfiable if and only if M is satisfiable over words with variability bounded with respect to the largest distances used in M (i.e., occurrences of next), but the size of Q is independent of such distances. Besides the theoretical interest, this result can help simplify the verification of systems with time-granularity heterogeneity, where large distances are required to express the coarse-grain dynamics in terms of fine-grain time units.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

A control-theoretical methodology for the scheduling problem

This paper presents a novel methodology to develop scheduling algorithms. The scheduling problem is phrased as a control problem, and control-theoretical techniques are used to design a scheduling algorithm that meets specific requirements. Unlike most approaches to feedback scheduling, where a controller integrates a "basic" scheduling algorithm and dynamically tunes its parameters and hence its performances, our methodology essentially reduces the design of a scheduling algorithm to the synthesis of a controller that closes the feedback loop. This approach allows the re-use of control-theoretical techniques to design efficient scheduling algorithms; it frames and solves the scheduling problem in a general setting; and it can naturally tackle certain peculiar requirements such as robustness and dynamic performance tuning. A few experiments demonstrate the feasibility of the approach on a real-time benchmark.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access