BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Panchi Li

Panchi Li contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.NANumerical AnalysisComputational Engineering, Finance, and Sciencephysics.comp-ph

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

A generalized Scharfetter-Gummel scheme for nonlocal cross-diffusion systems

An implicit Euler finite-volume scheme for a nonlocal cross-diffusion system on the multidimensional torus is analyzed. The equations describe the dynamics of population species with repulsive or attractive interactions. The numerical scheme is based on a generalized Scharfetter-Gummel discretization of the nonlocal flux term. For merely integrable kernel functions, the scheme preserves the positivity, total mass, and entropy structure. The existence of a discrete solution and its convergence to a solution to the continuous problem, as the mesh size tends to zero, are shown. A key difficulty is the degeneracy of the generalized Bernoulli function in the Scharfetter-Gummel approximation. This issue is overcome by proving a uniform estimate for the discrete Fisher information, which requires both the Boltzmann and Rao entropy inequalities. Numerical simulations illustrate the features of the scheme in one and two space dimensions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Convergence analysis of an implicit finite difference method for the inertial Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation

The Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert (LLG) equation is a widely used model for fast magnetization dynamics in ferromagnetic materials. Recently, the inertial LLG equation, which contains an inertial term, has been proposed to capture the ultra-fast magnetization dynamics at the sub-picosecond timescale. Mathematically, this generalized model contains the first temporal derivative and a newly introduced second temporal derivative of magnetization. Consequently, it produces extra difficulties in numerical analysis due to the mixed hyperbolic-parabolic type of this equation with degeneracy. In this work, we propose an implicit finite difference scheme based on the central difference in both time and space. A fixed point iteration method is applied to solve the implicit nonlinear system. With the help of a second order accurate constructed solution, we provide a convergence analysis in $H^1$ for this numerical scheme, in the $\ell^\infty (0, T; H_h^1)$ norm. It is shown that the proposed method is second order accurate in both time and space, with unconditional stability and a natural preservation of the magnetization length. In the hyperbolic regime, significant damping wave behaviors of magnetization at a shorter timescale are observed through numerical simulations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

A Gauss-Seidel projection method with the minimal number of updates for stray field in micromagnetic simulations

Magnetization dynamics in magnetic materials is often modeled by the Landau-Lifshitz equation, which is solved numerically in general. In micromagnetic simulations, the computational cost relies heavily on the time-marching scheme and the evaluation of stray field. Explicit marching schemes are efficient but suffer from severe stability constraints, while nonlinear systems of equations have to be solved in implicit schemes though they are unconditionally stable. A better compromise between stability and efficiency is the semi-implicit scheme, such as the Gauss-Seidel projection method (GSPM) and the second-order backward differentiation formula scheme (BDF2). At each marching step, GSPM solves several linear systems of equations with constant coefficients and updates the stray field several times, while BDF2 updates the stray field only once but solves a larger linear system of equations with variable coefficients and a nonsymmetric structure. In this work, we propose a new method, dubbed as GSPM-BDF2, by combing the advantages of both GSPM and BDF2. Like GSPM, this method is first-order accurate in time and second-order accurate in space, and is unconditionally stable with respect to the damping parameter. However, GSPM-BDF2 updates the stray field only once per time step, leading to an efficiency improvement of about $60\%$ than the state-of-the-art GSPM for micromagnetic simulations. For Standard Problem \#4 and \#5 from National Institute of Standards and Technology, GSPM-BDF2 reduces the computational time over the popular software OOMMF by $82\%$ and $96\%$, respectively. Thus, the proposed method provides a more efficient choice for micromagnetic simulations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Numerical methods for antiferromagnetics

Compared with ferromagnetic counterparts, antiferromagnetic materials are considered as the future of spintronic applications since these materials are robust against the magnetic perturbation, produce no stray field, and display ultrafast dynamics. There are (at least) two sets of magnetic moments in antiferromagnets (with magnetization of the same magnitude but antiparallel directions) and ferrimagnets (with magnetization of the different magnitude). The coupled dynamics for the bipartite collinear antiferromagnets is modeled by a coupled system of Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equations with an additional term originated from the antiferromagnetic exchange, which leads to femtosecond magnetization dynamics. In this paper, we develop three Gauss-Seidel projection methods for micromagnetics simulation in antiferromagnets and ferrimagnets. They are first-order accurate in time and second-order in space, and only solve linear systems of equations with constant coefficients at each step. Femtosecond dynamics, Néel wall structure, and phase transition in presence of an external magnetic field for antiferromagnets are provided with the femtosecond stepsize.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Two improved Gauss-Seidel projection methods for Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation

In this paper, we present two improved Gauss-Seidel projection methods with unconditional stability. The first method updates the gyromagnetic term and the damping term simultaneously and follows by a projection step. The second method introduces two sets of approximate solutions, where we update the gyromagnetic term and the damping term simultaneously for one set of approximate solutions and apply the projection step to the other set of approximate solutions in an alternating manner. Compared to the original Gauss-Seidel projection method which has to solve heat equations $7$ times at each time step, the improved methods solve heat equations $5$ times and $3$ times, respectively. First-order accuracy in time and second-order accuracy in space are verified by examples in both 1D and 3D. In addition, unconditional stability with respect to both the grid size and the damping parameter is confirmed numerically. Application of both methods to a realistic material is also presented with hysteresis loops and magnetization profiles. Compared with the original method, the recorded running times suggest that savings of both methods are about $2/7$ and $4/7$ for the same accuracy requirement, respectively.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access