Source author record

Pablo Cubides-Kovacsics

Pablo Cubides-Kovacsics appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
2topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2015arXiv

Topological cell decomposition and dimension theory in P-minimal fields

This paper addresses some questions about dimension theory for P-minimal structures. We show that, for any definable set A, the dimension of the frontier of A is strictly smaller than the dimension of A itself, and that A has a decomposition into definable, pure-dimensional components. This is then used to show that the intersection of finitely many definable dense subsets of A is still dense in A. As an application, we obtain that any m-ary definable function is continuous on a dense, relatively open subset of its domain, thereby answering a question that was originally posed by Haskell and Macpherson. In order to obtain these results, we show that P-minimal structures admit a type of cell decomposition, using a topological notion of cells inspired by real algebraic geometry.

preprint2014arXiv

Definable types in algebraically closed valued fields

Marker and Steinhorn shown that given two models $M\prec N$ of an o-minimal theory, if all 1-types over $M$ realized in $N$ are definable, then all types over $M$ realized in $N$ are definable. In this article we characterize pairs of algebraically closed valued fields satisfying the same property. Although it is true that if $M$ is an algebraically closed valued field such that all 1-types over $M$ are definable then all types over $M$ definable, we build a counterexample for the relative statement, \textit{i.e.}, we show for any $n\geq 1$ that there is a pair $M\prec N$ of algebraically closed valued fields such that all $n$-types over $M$ realized in $N$ are definable but there is an $n+1$-type over $M$ realized in $N$ which is not definable. Finally, we discuss what happens in the more general context of $C$-minimality.