Source author record

P. Rodieere

P. Rodieere appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2010arXiv

Thermodynamic phase diagram of Fe(Se$_{0.5}$Te$_{0.5}$) single crystals up to 28 Tesla

We report on specific heat ($C_p$), transport, Hall probe and penetration depth measurements performed on Fe(Se$_{0.5}$Te$_{0.5}$) single crystals ($T_c \sim 14$ K). The thermodynamic upper critical field $H_{c2}$ lines has been deduced from $C_p$ measurements up to 28 T for both $H\|c$ and $H\|ab$, and compared to the lines deduced from transport measurements (up to 55 T in pulsed magnetic fields). We show that this {\it thermodynamic} $H_{c2}$ line presents a very strong downward curvature for $T \rightarrow T_c$ which is not visible in transport measurements. This temperature dependence associated to an upward curvature of the field dependence of the Sommerfeld coefficient confirm that $H_{c2}$ is limited by paramagnetic effects. Surprisingly this paramagnetic limit is visible here up to $T/T_c \sim 0.99$ (for $H\|ab$) which is the consequence of a very small value of the coherence length $ξ_c(0) \sim 4 Å$ (and $ξ_{ab}(0) \sim 15 Å$), confirming the strong renormalisation of the effective mass (as compared to DMFT calculations) previously observed in ARPES measurements [Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 097002 (2010)]. $H_{c1}$ measurements lead to $λ_{ab}(0) = 430 \pm 50$ nm and $λ_c(0) = 1600 \pm 200$ nm and the corresponding anisotropy is approximatively temperature independent ($\sim 4$), being close to the anisotropy of $H_{c2}$ for $T\rightarrow T_c$. The temperature dependence of both $λ$ ($\propto T^2$) and the electronic contribution to the specific heat confirm the non conventional coupling mechanism in this system.