BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

P. Renjith

P. Renjith appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Discrete MathematicsData Structures and Algorithmsmath.CO

Catalog footprint

What is connected

6works
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

The Hamiltonian Cycle in $K_{1,r}$-free Split Graphs -- A Dichotomy

In this paper, we investigate the well-studied Hamiltonian cycle problem (HCYCLE), and present an interesting dichotomy result on split graphs. T. Akiyama et al. (1980) have shown that HCYCLE is NP-complete in planar bipartite graphs with maximum degree $3$. Using this reduction, we show that HCYCLE is NP-complete in split graphs. In particular, we show that the problem is NP-complete in $K_{1,5}$-free split graphs. Further, we present polynomial-time algorithms for Hamiltonian cycle in $K_{1,3}$-free and $K_{1,4}$-free split graphs. We believe that the structural results presented in this paper can be used to show similar dichotomy result for Hamiltonian path problem (HPATH) and other variants of HCYCLE.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

2-Trees: Structural Insights and the study of Hamiltonian Paths

For a connected graph, a path containing all vertices is known as \emph{Hamiltonian path}. For general graphs, there is no known necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of Hamiltonian paths and the complexity of finding a Hamiltonian path in general graphs is NP-Complete. We present a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of Hamiltonian paths in 2-trees. Using our characterization, we also present a linear-time algorithm for the existence of Hamiltonian paths in 2-trees. Our characterization is based on a deep understanding of the structure of 2-trees and the combinatorics presented here may be used in other combinatorial problems restricted to 2-trees.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Complexity of Steiner Tree in Split Graphs - Dichotomy Results

Given a connected graph $G$ and a terminal set $R \subseteq V(G)$, {\em Steiner tree} asks for a tree that includes all of $R$ with at most $r$ edges for some integer $r \geq 0$. It is known from [ND12,Garey et. al \cite{steinernpc}] that Steiner tree is NP-complete in general graphs. {\em Split graph} is a graph which can be partitioned into a clique and an independent set. K. White et. al \cite{white} has established that Steiner tree in split graphs is NP-complete. In this paper, we present an interesting dichotomy: we show that Steiner tree on $K_{1,4}$-free split graphs is polynomial-time solvable, whereas, Steiner tree on $K_{1,5}$-free split graphs is NP-complete. We investigate $K_{1,4}$-free and $K_{1,3}$-free (also known as claw-free) split graphs from a structural perspective. Further, using our structural study, we present polynomial-time algorithms for Steiner tree in $K_{1,4}$-free and $K_{1,3}$-free split graphs. Although, polynomial-time solvability of $K_{1,3}$-free split graphs is implied from $K_{1,4}$-free split graphs, we wish to highlight our structural observations on $K_{1,3}$-free split graphs which may be used in other combinatorial problems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Listing All Spanning Trees in Halin Graphs - Sequential and Parallel view

For a connected labelled graph $G$, a {\em spanning tree} $T$ is a connected and an acyclic subgraph that spans all vertices of $G$. In this paper, we consider a classical combinatorial problem which is to list all spanning trees of $G$. A Halin graph is a graph obtained from a tree with no degree two vertices and by joining all leaves with a cycle. We present a sequential and parallel algorithm to enumerate all spanning trees in Halin graphs. Our approach enumerates without repetitions and we make use of $O((2pd)^{p})$ processors for parallel algorithmics, where $d$ and $p$ are the depth, the number of leaves, respectively, of the Halin graph. We also prove that the number of spanning trees in Halin graphs is $O((2pd)^{p})$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Spanning Trees in 2-trees

A spanning tree of a graph $G$ is a connected acyclic spanning subgraph of $G$. We consider enumeration of spanning trees when $G$ is a $2$-tree, meaning that $G$ is obtained from one edge by iteratively adding a vertex whose neighborhood consists of two adjacent vertices. We use this construction order both to inductively list the spanning trees without repetition and to give bounds on the number of them. We determine the $n$-vertex $2$-trees having the most and the fewest spanning trees. The $2$-tree with the fewest is unique; it has $n-2$ vertices of degree $2$ and has $n2^{n-3}$ spanning trees. Those with the most are all those having exactly two vertices of degree $2$, and their number of spanning trees is the Fibonacci number $F_{2n-2}$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Spanning Tree Enumeration in 2-trees: Sequential and Parallel Perspective

For a connected graph, a vertex separator is a set of vertices whose removal creates at least two components. A vertex separator $S$ is minimal if it contains no other separator as a strict subset and a minimum vertex separator is a minimal vertex separator of least cardinality. A {\em clique} is a set of mutually adjacent vertices. A 2-tree is a connected graph in which every maximal clique is of size three and every minimal vertex separator is of size two. A spanning tree of a graph $G$ is a connected and an acyclic subgraph of $G$. In this paper, we focus our attention on two enumeration problems, both from sequential and parallel perspective. In particular, we consider listing all possible spanning trees of a 2-tree and listing all perfect elimination orderings of a chordal graph. As far as enumeration of spanning trees is concerned, our approach is incremental in nature and towards this end, we work with the construction order of the 2-tree, i.e. enumeration of $n$-vertex trees are from $n-1$ vertex trees, $n \geq 4$. Further, we also present a parallel algorithm for spanning tree enumeration using $O(2^n)$ processors. To our knowledge, this paper makes the first attempt in designing a parallel algorithm for this problem. We conclude this paper by presenting a sequential and parallel algorithm for enumerating all Perfect Elimination Orderings of a chordal graph.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access