BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Omar Saucedo

Omar Saucedo contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Populations and Evolution

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
1topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Host movement, transmission hot spots, and vector-borne disease dynamics on spatial networks

We examine how spatial heterogeneity combines with mobility network structure to influence vector-borne disease dynamics. Specifically, we consider a Ross-Macdonald-type disease model on $n$ spatial locations that are coupled by host movement on a strongly connected, weighted, directed graph. We derive a closed form approximation to the domain reproduction number using a Laurent series expansion, and use this approximation to compute sensitivities of the basic reproduction number to model parameters. To illustrate how these results can be used to help inform mitigation strategies, as a case study we apply these results to malaria dynamics in Namibia, using published cell phone data and estimates for local disease transmission. Our analytical results are particularly useful for understanding drivers of transmission when mobility sinks and transmission hot spots do not coincide.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Relating Eulerian and Lagrangian spatial models for vector-host diseases dynamics through a fundamental matrix

We explore the relationship between Eulerian and Lagrangian approaches for modeling movement in vector-borne diseases for discrete space. In the Eulerian approach we account for the movement of hosts explicitly through movement rates captured by a graph Laplacian matrix $L$. In the Lagrangian approach we only account for the proportion of time that individuals spend in foreign patches through a mixing matrix $P$. We establish a relationship between an Eulerian model and a Lagrangian model for the hosts in terms of the matrices $L$ and $P$. We say that the two modeling frameworks are consistent if for a given matrix $P$, the matrix $L$ can be chosen so that the residence times of the matrix $P$ and the matrix $L$ match. We find a sufficient condition for consistency, and examine disease quantities such as the final outbreak size and basic reproduction number in both the consistent and inconsistent cases. In the special case of a two-patch model, we observe how similar values for the basic reproduction number and final outbreak size can occur even in the inconsistent case. However, there are scenarios where the final sizes in both approaches can significantly differ by means of the relationship we propose.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access