Source author record

Olivier Vinciguerra

Olivier Vinciguerra appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
1topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A Stochastic Climate Model -- An approach to calibrate the Climate-Extended Risk Model (CERM)

The initial Climate-Extended Risk Model (CERM) addresses the estimate of climate-related financial risk embedded within a bank loan portfolio, through a climatic extension of the Basel II IRB model. It uses a Gaussian copula model calibrated with non stationary macro-correlations in order to reflect the future evolution of climate-related financial risks. In this complementary article, we propose a stochastic forward-looking methodology to calibrate climate macro-correlation evolution from scientific climate data, for physical and transition efforts specifically. We assume a global physical and transition risk, likened to persistent greenhouse gas (GHG) concentration in the atmosphere. The economic risk is considered stationary and can therefore be calibrated with a backward-looking methodology. We present 4 key principles to model the GDP and we propose to model the economic, physical and transition effort factors with three interdependent stochastic processes allowing for a calibration with seven well defined parameters. These parameters can be calibrated using public data. This new approach means not only to evaluate climate risks without picking any specific scenario but also allows to fill the gap between current one year approach of regulatory and economic capital models and the necessarily long-term view of climate risks by designing a framework to evaluate the resulting credit loss on each step (typically yearly) of the transition path. This new approach could prove instrumental in the 2022 context of central banks weighing the pros and cons of a climate capital charge.