BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Olivier Finkel

Olivier Finkel contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Logic in Computer Sciencemath.LOComputational ComplexityFormal Languages and Automata TheoryComputer Science and Game TheoryDiscrete Mathematics

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
10works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

10 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

On Bi-infinite and Conjugate Post Correspondence Problems

We study two modifications of the Post Correspondence Problem (PCP), namely 1) the bi-infinite version, where it is asked whether there exists a bi-infinite word such that two given morphisms agree on it, and 2) the conjugate version, where we require the images of a solution for two given morphisms are conjugates of each other. For the bi-infinite PCP we show that it is in the class $Σ_2^0$ of the arithmetical hierarchy and for the conjugate PCP we give an undecidability proof by reducing it to the word problem for a special type of semi-Thue systems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Descriptive Set Theory and $ω$-Powers of Finitary Languages

The $ω$-power of a finitary language L over a finite alphabet $Σ$ is the language of infinite words over $Σ$ defined by L $\infty$ := {w 0 w 1. .. $\in$ $Σ$ $ω$ | $\forall$i $\in$ $ω$ w i $\in$ L}. The $ω$-powers appear very naturally in Theoretical Computer Science in the characterization of several classes of languages of infinite words accepted by various kinds of automata, like B{ü}chi automata or B{ü}chi pushdown automata. We survey some recent results about the links relating Descriptive Set Theory and $ω$-powers.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

A Hierarchy of Tree-Automatic Structures

We consider $ω^n$-automatic structures which are relational structures whose domain and relations are accepted by automata reading ordinal words of length $ω^n$ for some integer $n\geq 1$. We show that all these structures are $ω$-tree-automatic structures presentable by Muller or Rabin tree automata. We prove that the isomorphism relation for $ω^2$-automatic (resp. $ω^n$-automatic for $n>2$) boolean algebras (respectively, partial orders, rings, commutative rings, non commutative rings, non commutative groups) is not determined by the axiomatic system ZFC. We infer from the proof of the above result that the isomorphism problem for $ω^n$-automatic boolean algebras, $n > 1$, (respectively, rings, commutative rings, non commutative rings, non commutative groups) is neither a $Σ_2^1$-set nor a $Π_2^1$-set. We obtain that there exist infinitely many $ω^n$-automatic, hence also $ω$-tree-automatic, atomless boolean algebras $B_n$, $n\geq 1$, which are pairwise isomorphic under the continuum hypothesis CH and pairwise non isomorphic under an alternate axiom AT, strengthening a result of [FT10].

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Borel Hierarchy and Omega Context Free Languages

We give in this paper additional answers to questions of Lescow and Thomas [Logical Specifications of Infinite Computations, In:"A Decade of Concurrency", Springer LNCS 803 (1994), 583-621], proving new topological properties of omega context free languages : there exist some omega-CFL which are non Borel sets. And one cannot decide whether an omega-CFL is a Borel set. We give also an answer to questions of Niwinski and Simonnet about omega powers of finitary languages, giving an example of a finitary context free language L such that L^omega is not a Borel set. Then we prove some recursive analogues to preceding properties: in particular one cannot decide whether an omega-CFL is an arithmetical set.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

The Determinacy of Context-Free Games

We prove that the determinacy of Gale-Stewart games whose winning sets are accepted by real-time 1-counter Büchi automata is equivalent to the determinacy of (effective) analytic Gale-Stewart games which is known to be a large cardinal assumption. We show also that the determinacy of Wadge games between two players in charge of omega-languages accepted by 1-counter Büchi automata is equivalent to the (effective) analytic Wadge determinacy. Using some results of set theory we prove that one can effectively construct a 1-counter Büchi automaton A and a Büchi automaton B such that: (1) There exists a model of ZFC in which Player 2 has a winning strategy in the Wadge game W(L(A), L(B)); (2) There exists a model of ZFC in which the Wadge game W(L(A), L(B)) is not determined. Moreover these are the only two possibilities, i.e. there are no models of ZFC in which Player 1 has a winning strategy in the Wadge game W(L(A), L(B)).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

The Isomorphism Relation Between Tree-Automatic Structures

An $ω$-tree-automatic structure is a relational structure whose domain and relations are accepted by Muller or Rabin tree automata. We investigate in this paper the isomorphism problem for $ω$-tree-automatic structures. We prove first that the isomorphism relation for $ω$-tree-automatic boolean algebras (respectively, partial orders, rings, commutative rings, non commutative rings, non commutative groups, nilpotent groups of class n >1) is not determined by the axiomatic system ZFC. Then we prove that the isomorphism problem for $ω$-tree-automatic boolean algebras (respectively, partial orders, rings, commutative rings, non commutative rings, non commutative groups, nilpotent groups of class n >1) is neither a $Σ_2^1$-set nor a $Π_2^1$-set.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2009arXiv

On Decidability Properties of One-Dimensional Cellular Automata

In a recent paper Sutner proved that the first-order theory of the phase-space $\mathcal{S}_\mathcal{A}=(Q^\mathbb{Z}, \longrightarrow)$ of a one-dimensional cellular automaton $\mathcal{A}$ whose configurations are elements of $Q^\mathbb{Z}$, for a finite set of states $Q$, and where $\longrightarrow$ is the "next configuration relation", is decidable. He asked whether this result could be extended to a more expressive logic. We prove in this paper that this is actuallly the case. We first show that, for each one-dimensional cellular automaton $\mathcal{A}$, the phase-space $\mathcal{S}_\mathcal{A}$ is an omega-automatic structure. Then, applying recent results of Kuske and Lohrey on omega-automatic structures, it follows that the first-order theory, extended with some counting and cardinality quantifiers, of the structure $\mathcal{S}_\mathcal{A}$, is decidable. We give some examples of new decidable properties for one-dimensional cellular automata. In the case of surjective cellular automata, some more efficient algorithms can be deduced from results of Kuske and Lohrey on structures of bounded degree. On the other hand we show that the case of cellular automata give new results on automatic graphs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2009arXiv

On Some Sets of Dictionaries Whose omega-Powers Have a Given Complexity

A dictionary is a set of finite words over some finite alphabet X. The omega-power of a dictionary V is the set of infinite words obtained by infinite concatenation of words in V. Lecomte studied in [Omega-powers and descriptive set theory, JSL 2005] the complexity of the set of dictionaries whose associated omega-powers have a given complexity. In particular, he considered the sets $W({\bf\Si}^0_{k})$ (respectively, $W({\bfΠ}^0_{k})$, $W({\bfΔ}_1^1)$) of dictionaries $V \subseteq 2^\star$ whose omega-powers are ${\bf\Si}^0_{k}$-sets (respectively, ${\bfΠ}^0_{k}$-sets, Borel sets). In this paper we first establish a new relation between the sets $W({\bfΣ}^0_{2})$ and $W({\bfΔ}_1^1)$, showing that the set $W({\bfΔ}_1^1)$ is "more complex" than the set $W({\bfΣ}^0_{2})$. As an application we improve the lower bound on the complexity of $W({\bfΔ}_1^1)$ given by Lecomte. Then we prove that, for every integer $k\geq 2$, (respectively, $k\geq 3$) the set of dictionaries $W({\bfΠ}^0_{k+1})$ (respectively, $W({\bf\Si}^0_{k+1})$) is "more complex" than the set of dictionaries $W({\bfΠ}^0_{k})$ (respectively, $W({\bf\Si}^0_{k})$) .

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access