Source author record

Oliver G. Ernst

Oliver G. Ernst appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Wasserstein sensitivity of Risk and Uncertainty Propagation

When propagating uncertainty in the data of differential equations, the probability laws describing the uncertainty are typically themselves subject to uncertainty. We present a sensitivity analysis of uncertainty propagation for differential equations with random inputs to perturbations of the input measures. We focus on the elliptic diffusion equation with random coefficient and source term, for which the probability measure of the solution random field is shown to be Lipschitz-continuous in both total variation and Wasserstein distance. The result generalizes to the solution map of any differential equation with locally Hölder dependence on input parameters. In addition, these results extend to Lipschitz continuous quantities of interest of the solution as well as to coherent risk functionals of these applied to evaluate the impact of their uncertainty. Our analysis is based on the sensitivity of risk functionals and pushforward measures for locally Hölder mappings with respect to the Wasserstein distance of perturbed input distributions. The established results are applied, in particular, to the case of lognormal diffusion and the truncation of series representations of input random fields.

preprint2020arXiv

On Expansions and Nodes for Sparse Grid Collocation of Lognormal Elliptic PDEs

This work is a follow-up to our previous contribution ("Convergence of sparse collocation for functions of countably many Gaussian random variables (with application to elliptic PDEs)", SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 2018), and contains further insights on some aspects of the solution of elliptic PDEs with lognormal diffusion coefficients using sparse grids. Specifically, we first focus on the choice of univariate interpolation rules, advocating the use of Gaussian Leja points as introduced by Narayan and Jakeman ("Adaptive Leja sparse grid constructions for stochastic collocation and high-dimensional approximation", SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 2014) and then discuss the possible computational advantages of replacing the standard Karhunen-Loève expansion of the diffusion coefficient with the Lévy-Ciesielski expansion, motivated by theoretical work of Bachmayr, Cohen, DeVore, and Migliorati ("Sparse polynomial approximation of parametric elliptic PDEs. part II: lognormal coefficients", ESAIM: M2AN, 2016). Our numerical results indicate that, for the problem under consideration, Gaussian Leja collocation points outperform Gauss-Hermite and Genz-Keister nodes for the sparse grid approximation and that the Karhunen-Loève expansion of the log diffusion coefficient is more appropriate than its Lévy-Ciesielski expansion for purpose of sparse grid collocation.

preprint2015arXiv

Analysis of the Ensemble and Polynomial Chaos Kalman Filters in Bayesian Inverse Problems

We analyze the Ensemble and Polynomial Chaos Kalman filters applied to nonlinear stationary Bayesian inverse problems. In a sequential data assimilation setting such stationary problems arise in each step of either filter. We give a new interpretation of the approximations produced by these two popular filters in the Bayesian context and prove that, in the limit of large ensemble or high polynomial degree, both methods yield approximations which converge to a well-defined random variable termed the analysis random variable. We then show that this analysis variable is more closely related to a specific linear Bayes estimator than to the solution of the associated Bayesian inverse problem given by the posterior measure. This suggests limited or at least guarded use of these generalized Kalman filter methods for the purpose of uncertainty quantification.