Source author record

Oliver Baur

Oliver Baur appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
1topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2016arXiv

Gravity field and solar component of the precession rate and nutation coefficients of Comet 67P Churyumov-Gerasimenko

The aim of this study is first to determine the gravity field of the comet 67P Churyumov-Gerasimenko and second to derive the solar component of the precession rate and nutation coefficients of the spin axis of the comet nucleus, i.e. without the direct, usually larger, effect of outgassing. The gravity field, and related moments of inertia, are obtained from two polyhedra, that are provided by the OSIRIS and NAV-CAM experiments on Rosetta, and are based on the assumption of uniform density for the comet nucleus. We also calculate the forced precession rate as well as the nutation coefficients on the basis of Kinoshita's theory of rotation of the rigid Earth and adapted it to be able to indirectly include the effect of outgassing on the rotational parameters. The 2nd degree denormalized Stokes coefficients of comet 67P C-G turn out to be (bracketed numbers refer to second shape model) C20 = -6.74 [-7.93] * 10^-2, C22 = 2.60 [2.71] * 10^-2 consistent with normalized principal moments of inertia A/MR^2 = 0.13 [0.11], B/MR^2 = 0.23 [0.22], with polar moment c = C/MR^2 = 0.25, depending on the choice of the polyhedron model. The obliquity between the rotation axis and the mean orbit normal is 52 degree, and the precession rate only due to solar torques becomes 20-30 "/y. Oscillations in longitude caused by the gravitational pull of the Sun turn out to be of the order of 1', oscillations in obliquity can be estimated to be of the order of 0.5'.

preprint2016arXiv

Spheroidal and ellipsoidal harmonic expansions of the gravitational potential of small Solar System bodies. Case study: Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko

Gravitational features are a fundamental source of information to learn more about the interior structure and composition of planets, moons, asteroids and comets. Gravitational field modeling typically approximates the target body with a sphere, leading to a representation in spherical harmonics. However, small celestial bodies are often irregular in shape, and hence poorly approximated by a sphere. A much better suited geometrical fit is achieved by a tri-axial ellipsoid. This is also mirrored in the fact that the associated harmonic expansion (ellipsoidal harmonics) shows a significantly better convergence behavior as opposed to spherical harmonics. Unfortunately, complex mathematics and numerical problems (arithmetic overflow) so far severely limited the applicability of ellipsoidal harmonics. In this paper, we present a method that allows expanding ellipsoidal harmonics to a considerably higher degree compared to existing techniques. We apply this novel approach to model the gravitational field of comet 67P, the final target of the Rosetta mission. The comparison of results based on the ellipsoidal parameterization with those based on the spheroidal and spherical approximations reveals that the latter is clearly inferior; the spheroidal solution, on the other hand, is virtually just as accurate as the ellipsoidal one. Finally, in order to generalize our findings, we assess the gravitational field modeling performance for some 400 small bodies in the solar system. From this investigation we generally conclude that the spheroidal representation is an attractive alternative to the complex ellipsoidal parameterization on the one hand, and the inadequate spherical representation on the other hand.