Researcher profile

Oleg Kiselyov

Oleg Kiselyov contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Programming Languages Artificial Intelligence Computer Vision Data Structures and Algorithms Logic in Computer Science Symbolic Computation

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - Emerging

8works

0followers

6topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2022arXiv

Complete Stream Fusion for Software-Defined Radio

Software-Defined Radio (SDR) is widely used not only as a practical application but also as a fitting benchmark of high-performance signal processing. We report using the SDR benchmark -- specifically, FM Radio reception -- to evaluate the recently developed single-thread stream processing library strymonas, contrasting it with the synchronous dataflow system StreamIt. Despite the absence of parallel processing or windowing as a core primitive, strymonas turns out to easily support SDR, offering high expressiveness and performance, approaching the peak single-core floating-point performance, sufficient for real-time FM reception.

preprint2022arXiv

let (rec) insertion without Effects, Lights or Magic

Let insertion in program generation is producing code with definitions (let-statements). Although definitions precede uses in generated code, during code generation `uses' come first: we might not even know a definition is needed until we encounter a reoccurring expression. Definitions are thus generated `in hindsight', which explains why this process is difficult to understand and implement -- even more so for parameterized, recursive and mutually recursive definitions. We have earlier presented an interface for let(rec) insertion -- i.e. for generating (mutually recursive) definitions. We demonstrated its expressiveness and applications, but not its implementation, which relied on effects and compiler magic. We now show how one can understand let insertion, and hence implement it in plain OCaml. We give the first denotational semantics of let(rec)-insertion, which does not rely on any effects at all. The formalization has guided the implementation of let(rec) insertion in the current version of MetaOCaml.

preprint2016arXiv

Answer-Type Modification without Tears: Prompt-Passing Style Translation for Typed Delimited-Control Operators

The salient feature of delimited-control operators is their ability to modify answer types during computation. The feature, answer-type modification (ATM for short), allows one to express various interesting programs such as typed printf compactly and nicely, while it makes it difficult to embed these operators in standard functional languages. In this paper, we present a typed translation of delimited-control operators shift and reset with ATM into a familiar language with multi-prompt shift and reset without ATM, which lets us use ATM in standard languages without modifying the type system. Our translation generalizes Kiselyov's direct-style implementation of typed printf, which uses two prompts to emulate the modification of answer types, and passes them during computation. We prove that our translation preserves typing. As the naive prompt-passing style translation generates and passes many prompts even for pure terms, we show an optimized translation that generate prompts only when needed, which is also type-preserving. Finally, we give an implementation in the tagless-final style which respects typing by construction.

preprint2016arXiv

Stream Fusion, to Completeness

Stream processing is mainstream (again): Widely-used stream libraries are now available for virtually all modern OO and functional languages, from Java to C# to Scala to OCaml to Haskell. Yet expressivity and performance are still lacking. For instance, the popular, well-optimized Java 8 streams do not support the zip operator and are still an order of magnitude slower than hand-written loops. We present the first approach that represents the full generality of stream processing and eliminates overheads, via the use of staging. It is based on an unusually rich semantic model of stream interaction. We support any combination of zipping, nesting (or flat-mapping), sub-ranging, filtering, mapping-of finite or infinite streams. Our model captures idiosyncrasies that a programmer uses in optimizing stream pipelines, such as rate differences and the choice of a "for" vs. "while" loops. Our approach delivers hand-written-like code, but automatically. It explicitly avoids the reliance on black-box optimizers and sufficiently-smart compilers, offering highest, guaranteed and portable performance. Our approach relies on high-level concepts that are then readily mapped into an implementation. Accordingly, we have two distinct implementations: an OCaml stream library, staged via MetaOCaml, and a Scala library for the JVM, staged via LMS. In both cases, we derive libraries richer and simultaneously many tens of times faster than past work. We greatly exceed in performance the standard stream libraries available in Java, Scala and OCaml, including the well-optimized Java 8 streams.

preprint2015arXiv

Proceedings ML Family/OCaml Users and Developers workshops

This volume collects the extended versions of selected papers originally presented at the two ACM SIGPLAN workshops: ML Family Workshop 2014 and OCaml 2014. Both were affiliated with ICFP 2014 and took place on two consecutive days, on September 4 and 5, 2014 in Gothenburg, Sweden. The ML Family workshop aims to recognize the entire extended family of ML and ML-like languages: languages that are Higher-order, Typed, Inferred, and Strict. It provides the forum to discuss common issues, both practical (compilation techniques, implementations of concurrency and parallelism, programming for the Web) and theoretical (fancy types, module systems, metaprogramming). The scope of the workshop includes all aspects of the design, semantics, theory, application, implementation, and teaching of the members of the ML family. The OCaml workshop is more specifically targeted at the OCaml community, with an emphasis on new proposals and tools aiming to improve OCaml, its environment, and the functioning of the community. As such, it is interested in works on the type system, language extensions, compiler and optimizations, applications, tools, and experience reports of exciting uses.

preprint2012arXiv

Monolingual Probabilistic Programming Using Generalized Coroutines

Probabilistic programming languages and modeling toolkits are two modular ways to build and reuse stochastic models and inference procedures. Combining strengths of both, we express models and inference as generalized coroutines in the same general-purpose language. We use existing facilities of the language, such as rich libraries, optimizing compilers, and types, to develop concise, declarative, and realistic models with competitive performance on exact and approximate inference. In particular, a wide range of models can be expressed using memoization. Because deterministic parts of models run at full speed, custom inference procedures are trivial to incorporate, and inference procedures can reason about themselves without interpretive overhead. Within this framework, we introduce a new, general algorithm for importance sampling with look-ahead.

preprint2011arXiv

Implementing Explicit and Finding Implicit Sharing in Embedded DSLs

Aliasing, or sharing, is prominent in many domains, denoting that two differently-named objects are in fact identical: a change in one object (memory cell, circuit terminal, disk block) is instantly reflected in the other. Languages for modelling such domains should let the programmer explicitly define the sharing among objects or expressions. A DSL compiler may find other identical expressions and share them, implicitly. Such common subexpression elimination is crucial to the efficient implementation of DSLs. Sharing is tricky in embedded DSL, since host aliasing may correspond to copying of the underlying objects rather than their sharing. This tutorial summarizes discussions of implementing sharing in Haskell DSLs for automotive embedded systems and hardware description languages. The technique has since been used in a Haskell SAT solver and the DSL for music synthesis. We demonstrate the embedding in pure Haskell of a simple DSL with a language form for explicit sharing. The DSL also has implicit sharing, implemented via hash-consing. Explicit sharing greatly speeds up hash-consing. The seemingly imperative nature of hash-consing is hidden beneath a simple combinator language. The overall implementation remains pure functional and easy to reason about.

preprint2000arXiv

Image Compression with Iterated Function Systems, Finite Automata and Zerotrees: Grand Unification

Fractal image compression, Culik's image compression and zerotree prediction coding of wavelet image decomposition coefficients succeed only because typical images being compressed possess a significant degree of self-similarity. Besides the common concept, these methods turn out to be even more tightly related, to the point of algorithmical reducibility of one technique to another. The goal of the present paper is to demonstrate these relations. The paper offers a plain-term interpretation of Culik's image compression, in regular image processing terms, without resorting to finite state machines and similar lofty language. The interpretation is shown to be algorithmically related to an IFS fractal image compression method: an IFS can be exactly transformed into Culik's image code. Using this transformation, we will prove that in a self-similar (part of an) image any zero wavelet coefficient is the root of a zerotree, or its branch. The paper discusses the zerotree coding of (wavelet/projection) coefficients as a common predictor/corrector, applied vertically through different layers of a multiresolutional decomposition, rather than within the same view. This interpretation leads to an insight into the evolution of image compression techniques: from a causal single-layer prediction, to non-causal same-view predictions (wavelet decomposition among others) and to a causal cross-layer prediction (zero-trees, Culik's method).