BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Norihiro Yamada

Norihiro Yamada contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Logic in Computer Sciencemath.LOmath.CODiscrete Mathematics

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
4topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Game semantics of universes

This work extends the present author's computational game semantics of Martin-Löf type theory to the cumulative hierarchy of universes. This extension completes game semantics of all standard types of Martin-Löf type theory for the first time in the 30 years history of modern game semantics. As a result, the powerful combinatorial reasoning of game semantics becomes available for the study of universes and types generated by them. A main challenge in achieving game semantics of universes comes from a conflict between identity types and universes: Naive game semantics of the encoding of an identity type by a universe induces a decision procedure on the equality between functions, a contradiction to a well-known fact in recursion theory. We overcome this problem by novel games for universes that encode games for identity types without deciding the equality.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Sequent calculi for a unity of logic

We present a novel unity of logic, viz., a single sequent calculus that embodies classical, intuitionistic and linear logics. Concretely, we define classical linear logic negative (CLL$^-$), a new logic that is classical and linear yet discards the polarities and the strict De Morgan laws in classical linear logic (CLL). Then, we define unlinearisation and classicalisation on sequent calculi such that unlinearisation maps CLL$^-$ (resp. intuitionistic linear logic (ILL)) to classical logic (CL) (resp. intuitionistic logic (IL)), and classicalisation maps IL (resp. ILL) to CL (resp. CLL$^-$) modulo conservative extensions. By these two maps, only a sequent calculus for a conservative extension of ILL suffices for ILL, IL, CLL$^-$ and CL. This result achieves a simple, highly systematic unity of logic by discarding the polarities and the strict De Morgan laws, which (arguably) only CLL has, and consisting of the uniform classicalisation and unlinearisation, which commute. Previous methods do not satisfy these points. Our unity also clarifies the dichotomies between intuitionisity and classicality, and between linearity and non-linearity of logic, which are symmetric.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Game semantics of Martin-Löf type theory, part III: its consistency with Church's thesis

We prove consistency of intensional Martin-Löf type theory (MLTT) with formal Church's thesis (CT), which was open for at least fifteen years. The difficulty in proving the consistency is that a standard method of realizability à la Kleene does not work for the consistency, though it validates CT, as it does not model MLTT; specifically, the realizability does not validate MLTT's congruence rule on pi-types (known as the $ξ$-rule). We overcome this point and prove the consistency by novel realizability à la game semantics, which is based on the author's previous work.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2018arXiv

Dynamic Game Semantics

The present paper gives a mathematical, in particular, syntax-independent, formulation of intensionality and dynamics of computation in terms of games and strategies. Specifically, we give a game semantics for a higher-order programming language that distinguishes programs with the same value yet different algorithms (or intensionality), equipped with the hiding operation on strategies that precisely corresponds to the (small-step) operational semantics (or dynamics) of the language. Categorically, our games and strategies give rise to a cartesian closed bicategory, and our game semantics forms an instance of a generalization of the standard interpretation of functional programming languages in cartesian closed categories. This work is intended to be the first step towards a mathematical (both categorical and game-semantic) foundation of intensional and dynamic aspects of logic and computation; our approach should be applicable to a wide range of logics and computations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access