Source author record

Niu Liu

Niu Liu appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Evaluation of the ICRF stability from position time series analysis

The celestial reference frame is realized by absolute positions of extragalactic sources that are assumed to be fixed in the space. The fixing of the axes is one of the crucial points for the International Celestial Reference System (ICRS) concept. However, due to various effects such as its intrinsic activity, the apparent position of the extragalactic sources may vary with time, resulting in a time-dependent deviation of the frame axes that are defined by the positions of these sources. We aim to evaluate the axis stability of the third realization of the International Celestial Reference Frame (ICRF3). We first derive the extragalactic source position time series from observations of very long baseline interferometry (VLBI) at the dual $S/X$-band (2.3/8.4~GHz) between August 1979 and December 2020. We measured the stability of the ICRF3 axes in terms of the drift and scatter around the mean: (i) we estimate the global spin of the ICRF3 axes based on the apparent proper motion (slope of the position time series) of the ICRF3 defining sources; (ii) we also construct the yearly representations of the ICRF3 through annually averaged positions of the ICRF3 defining sources and estimate the dispersion in the axis orientation of these yearly frames. The global spin is no higher than $\mathrm{0.8\,μas\,yr^{-1}}$ for each ICRF3 axis with an uncertainty of $\mathrm{0.3\,μas\,yr^{-1}}$, corresponding to an accumulated deformation smaller than $\mathrm{30\,μas}$ for the celestial frame axes during 1979.6--2021.0. The axis orientation of the yearly celestial frame becomes more stable as time elapses, with a standard deviation of 10--20$\mathrm{\,μas}$ for each axis. The axes of the ICRF3 are stable at approximately 10--20~$\mathrm{μas}$ from 1979.6--2021.0 and the axis stability does not degrade after the adoption of the ICRF3.

preprint2019arXiv

Systematics and accuracy of VLBI astrometry: What can be learned from a comparison with Gaia Data Release 2

We aim to investigate the overall properties of the ICRF3 with the help of the Gaia Data release 2 (Gaia DR2). This could serve as an external check of the quality of the ICRF3. The radio source positions of the ICRF3 catalog were compared with the Gaia DR2 positions of their optical counterparts at G < 18.7. Their properties were analyzed in terms of the dependency of the quoted error on the number of observations, on the declination, and the global difference, the latter revealed by means of expansions in the vector spherical harmonics. The ICRF3 S/X-band catalog shows a more smooth dependency on the number of observations than the ICRF1 and ICRF2, while the K and X/Ka-band yield a dependency discrepancy at the number of observations of about 50. The rotation of all ICRF catalogs show consistent results, except for the X-component of the X/Ka-band which arises from the positional error in the non-defining sources. No significant glides were found between the ICRF3 S/X-band component and Gaia DR2. However, the K- and X/Ka- band frames show a dipolar deformation in Y-component of +50μas and several quadrupolar terms of 50μas in an absolute sense. A significant glide along Z-axis exceeding 200 μas in the X/Ka-band was also reported. These systematics in the ICRF catalog are shown to be less dependent on the limiting magnitude of the Gaia sample when the number of common sources is sufficient (> 100). The ICRF3 S/X-band catalog shows improved accuracy and systematics at the level of noise floor. But the zonal errors in the X/Ka-band should be noted, especially in the context of comparisons of multi-frequency positions for individual sources.