Researcher profile

Nikolai Kosmatov

Nikolai Kosmatov contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Software Engineering

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - Baseline

3works

0followers

1topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2022arXiv

Certified Verification of Relational Properties

The use of function contracts to specify the behavior of functions often remains limited to the scope of a single function call. Relational properties link several function calls together within a single specification. They can express more advanced properties of a given function, such as non-interference, continuity, or monotonicity. They can also relate calls to different functions, for instance, to show that an optimized implementation is equivalent to its original counterpart. However, relational properties cannot be expressed and verified directly in the traditional setting of modular deductive verification. Self-composition has been proposed to overcome this limitation, but it requires complex transformations and additional separation hypotheses for real-life languages with pointers. We propose a novel approach that is not based on code transformation and avoids those drawbacks. It directly applies a verification condition generator to produce logical formulas that must be verified to ensure a given relational property. The approach has been fully formalized and proved sound in the Coq proof assistant.

preprint2015arXiv

Your Proof Fails? Testing Helps to Find the Reason

Applying deductive verification to formally prove that a program respects its formal specification is a very complex and time-consuming task due in particular to the lack of feedback in case of proof failures. Along with a non-compliance between the code and its specification (due to an error in at least one of them), possible reasons of a proof failure include a missing or too weak specification for a called function or a loop, and lack of time or simply incapacity of the prover to finish a particular proof. This work proposes a new methodology where test generation helps to identify the reason of a proof failure and to exhibit a counter-example clearly illustrating the issue. We describe how to transform an annotated C program into C code suitable for testing and illustrate the benefits of the method on comprehensive examples. The method has been implemented in STADY, a plugin of the software analysis platform FRAMA-C. Initial experiments show that detecting non-compliances and contract weaknesses allows to precisely diagnose most proof failures.

preprint2013arXiv

Efficient Leverage of Symbolic ATG Tools to Advanced Coverage Criteria

Automatic test data generation (ATG) is a major topic in software engineering. In this paper, we seek to bridge the gap between the coverage criteria supported by symbolic ATG tools and the most advanced coverage criteria found in the literature. We define a new testing criterion, label coverage, and prove it to be both expressive and amenable to efficient automation. We propose several innovative techniques resulting in an effective black-box support for label coverage, while a direct approach induces an exponential blow-up of the search space. Initial experiments show that ATG for label coverage can be achieved at a reasonable cost and that our optimisations yield very significant savings.