BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Nicolò Cangiotti

Nicolò Cangiotti contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
cs.CYecon.THmath-phmath.HOmath.MPmath.NT

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Confirming Mathematical Conjectures by Analogy

Analogy has received attention as a form of inductive reasoning in the empirical sciences. However, its role in pure mathematics has received less consideration. This paper provides an account of how an analogy with a more familiar mathematical domain can contribute to the confirmation of a mathematical conjecture. By reference to case-studies, we propose a distinction between an incremental and a non-incremental form of confirmation by mathematical analogy. We offer an account of the former within the popular framework of Bayesian confirmation theory. As for the non-incremental notion, we defend its role in rationally informing the prior credences of mathematicians in those circumstances in which no new mathematical evidence is introduced. The resulting 'hybrid' framework captures many important aspects of the use of analogical inference in the realm of pure mathematics.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Group Fairness Is Not Derivable From Justice: a Mathematical Proof

We argue that an imperfect criminal law procedure cannot be group-fair, if 'group fairness' involves ensuring the same chances of acquittal or convictions to all innocent defendants independently of their morally arbitrary features. We show mathematically that only a perfect procedure (involving no mistake), a non-deterministic one, or a degenerate one (everyone or no one is convicted) can guarantee group fairness, in the general case. Following a recent proposal, we adopt a definition of group fairness, requiring that individuals who are equal in merit ought to have the same statistical chances of obtaining advantages and disadvantages, in a way that is statistically independent of any of their feature that does not count as merit. We explain by mathematical argument that the only imperfect procedures offering an a-priori guarantee of fairness in relation to all non-merit trait are lotteries or degenerate ones (i.e., everyone or no one is convicted). To provide a more intuitive point of view, we exploit an adjustment of the well-known ROC space, in order to represent all possible procedures in our model by a schematic diagram. The argument seems to be equally valid for all human procedures, provided they are imperfect. This clearly includes algorithmic decision-making, including decisions based on statistical predictions, since in practice all statistical models are error prone.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Normal and pseudonormal numbers

After a short review of the historical milestones on normal numbers, we introduce the Borel numbers as the reals admitting a probability function on their different bases representations. In this setting, we provide two probabilistic characterizations of normality based on the stochastic independence of their digits. Finally, we define the pseudonormality condition, which is satisfied by normal numbers and may be evaluated in a finite number of steps.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Notes on a conformal characterization of $2$-dimensional Lorentzian manifolds with constant Ricci scalar curvature

We present a characterization of $2$-dimensional Lorentzian manifolds with constant Ricci scalar curvature. It is well known that every $2$-dimensional Lorentzian manifolds is conformally flat, so we rewrite the Ricci scalar curvature in terms of the conformal factor and we study the solutions of the corresponding differential equations. Several remarkable examples are provided.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access