Researcher profile

Nicholas J. Curtis

Nicholas J. Curtis contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 11 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
1works
0followers
1topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Accelerating reactive-flow simulations using vectorized chemistry integration

The high cost of chemistry integration is a significant computational bottleneck for realistic reactive-flow simulations using operator splitting. Here we present a methodology to accelerate the solution of the chemical kinetic ordinary differential equations using single-instruction, multiple-data vector processing on CPUs using the OpenCL framework. First, we compared several vectorized integration algorithms using chemical kinetic source terms and analytical Jacobians from the pyJac software against a widely used integration code, CVODEs. Next, we extended the OpenFOAM computational fluid dynamics library to incorporate the vectorized solvers, and we compared the accuracy of a fourth-order linearly implicit integrator -- both in vectorized form and a corresponding method native to OpenFOAM -- with the community standard chemical kinetics library Cantera. We then applied our methodology to a variety of chemical kinetic models, turbulent intensities, and simulation scales to examine a range of engineering and scientific scale problems, including (pseudo) steady-state as well as time-dependent Reynolds-averaged Navier--Stokes simulations of the Sandia flame D and the Volvo Flygmotor bluff-body stabilized, premixed flame. Subsequently, we compared the performance of the vectorized and native OpenFOAM integrators over the studied models and simulations and found that our vectorized approach performs up to 33--35x faster than the native OpenFOAM solver with high accuracy.