BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Niall Bootland

Niall Bootland contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.NANumerical Analysis

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Can DtN and GenEO coarse spaces be sufficiently robust for heterogeneous Helmholtz problems?

Numerical solution of heterogeneous Helmholtz problems presents various computational challenges, with descriptive theory remaining out of reach for many popular approaches. Robustness and scalability are key for practical and reliable solvers in large-scale applications, especially for large wave number problems. In this work we explore the use of a GenEO-type coarse space to build a two-level additive Schwarz method applicable to highly indefinite Helmholtz problems. Through a range of numerical tests on a 2D model problem, discretised by finite elements on pollution-free meshes, we observe robust convergence, iteration counts that do not increase with the wave number, and good scalability of our approach. We further provide results showing a favourable comparison with the DtN coarse space. Our numerical study shows promise that our solver methodology can be effective for challenging heterogeneous applications.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Analysis of parallel Schwarz algorithms for time-harmonic problems using block Toeplitz matrices

In this work we study the convergence properties of the one-level parallel Schwarz method with Robin transmission conditions applied to the one-dimensional and two-dimensional Helmholtz and Maxwell's equations. One-level methods are not scalable in general. However, it has recently been proven that when impedance transmission conditions are used in the case of the algorithm applied to the equations with absorption, under certain assumptions, scalability can be achieved and no coarse space is required. We show here that this result is also true for the iterative version of the method at the continuous level for strip-wise decompositions into subdomains that can typically be encountered when solving wave-guide problems. The convergence proof relies on the particular block Toeplitz structure of the global iteration matrix. Although non-Hermitian, we prove that its limiting spectrum has a near identical form to that of a Hermitian matrix of the same structure. We illustrate our results with numerical experiments.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Solving periodic semilinear stiff PDEs in 1D, 2D and 3D with exponential integrators

Dozens of exponential integration formulas have been proposed for the high-accuracy solution of stiff PDEs such as the Allen-Cahn, Korteweg-de Vries and Ginzburg-Landau equations. We report the results of extensive comparisons in MATLAB and Chebfun of such formulas in 1D, 2D and 3D, focusing on fourth and higher order methods, and periodic semilinear stiff PDEs with constant coefficients. Our conclusion is that it is hard to do much better than one of the simplest of these formulas, the ETDRK4 scheme of Cox and Matthews.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Preconditioners for Two-Phase Incompressible Navier-Stokes Flow

We consider iterative methods for solving the linearised Navier-Stokes equations arising from two-phase flow problems and the efficient preconditioning of such systems when using mixed finite element methods. Our target application is simulation within the Proteus toolkit; in particular, we will give results for a dynamic dam-break problem in 2D. We focus on a preconditioner motivated by approximate commutators which has proved effective, displaying mesh-independent convergence for the constant coefficient single-phase Navier-Stokes equations. This approach is known as the "pressure convection-diffusion" (PCD) preconditioner [H. C. Elman, D. J. Silvester and A. J. Wathen, Finite Elements and Fast Iterative Solvers: with Applications in Incompressible Fluid Dynamics, second ed., Oxford University Press, 2014]. However, the original technique fails to give comparable performance in its given form when applied to variable coefficient Navier-Stokes systems such as those arising in two-phase flow models. Here we develop a generalisation of this preconditioner appropriate for two-phase flow, requiring a new form for PCD. We omit considerations of boundary conditions to focus on the key features of two-phase flow. Before considering our target application, we present numerical results within the controlled setting of a simplified problem using a variety of different mixed elements. We compare these results with those for a straightforward extension to another commutator-based method known as the "least-squares commutator" (LSC) preconditioner, a technique also discussed in the aforementioned reference. We demonstrate that favourable properties of the original PCD and LSC preconditioners (without boundary adjustments) are retained with the new preconditioners in the two-phase situation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access