Source author record

Nemanja Spasojevic

Nemanja Spasojevic appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

5works
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2016arXiv

Actionable and Political Text Classification using Word Embeddings and LSTM

In this work, we apply word embeddings and neural networks with Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) to text classification problems, where the classification criteria are decided by the context of the application. We examine two applications in particular. The first is that of Actionability, where we build models to classify social media messages from customers of service providers as Actionable or Non-Actionable. We build models for over 30 different languages for actionability, and most of the models achieve accuracy around 85%, with some reaching over 90% accuracy. We also show that using LSTM neural networks with word embeddings vastly outperform traditional techniques. Second, we explore classification of messages with respect to political leaning, where social media messages are classified as Democratic or Republican. The model is able to classify messages with a high accuracy of 87.57%. As part of our experiments, we vary different hyperparameters of the neural networks, and report the effect of such variation on the accuracy. These actionability models have been deployed to production and help company agents provide customer support by prioritizing which messages to respond to. The model for political leaning has been opened and made available for wider use.

preprint2016arXiv

Mining Half a Billion Topical Experts Across Multiple Social Networks

Mining topical experts on social media is a problem that has gained significant attention due to its wide-ranging applications. Here we present the first study that combines data from four major social networks -- Twitter, Facebook, Google+ and LinkedIn, along with the Wikipedia graph and internet webpage text and metadata, to rank topical experts across the global population of users. We perform an in-depth analysis of 37 features derived from various data sources such as message text, user lists, webpages, social graphs and wikipedia. This large-scale study includes more than 12 billion messages over a 90-day sliding window and 58 billion social graph edges. Comparison reveals that features derived from Twitter Lists, Wikipedia, internet webpages and Twitter Followers are especially good indicators of expertise. We train an expertise ranking model using these features on a large ground truth dataset containing almost 90,000 labels. This model is applied within a production system that ranks over 650 million experts in more than 9,000 topical domains on a daily basis. We provide results and examples on the effectiveness of our expert ranking system, along with empirical validation. Finally, we make the topical expertise data available through open REST APIs for wider use.

preprint2015arXiv

Identifying Actionable Messages on Social Media

Text actionability detection is the problem of classifying user authored natural language text, according to whether it can be acted upon by a responding agent. In this paper, we propose a supervised learning framework for domain-aware, large-scale actionability classification of social media messages. We derive lexicons, perform an in-depth analysis for over 25 text based features, and explore strategies to handle domains that have limited training data. We apply these methods to over 46 million messages spanning 75 companies and 35 languages, from both Facebook and Twitter. The models achieve an aggregate population-weighted F measure of 0.78 and accuracy of 0.74, with values of over 0.9 in some cases.

preprint2015arXiv

Klout Score: Measuring Influence Across Multiple Social Networks

In this work, we present the Klout Score, an influence scoring system that assigns scores to 750 million users across 9 different social networks on a daily basis. We propose a hierarchical framework for generating an influence score for each user, by incorporating information for the user from multiple networks and communities. Over 3600 features that capture signals of influential interactions are aggregated across multiple dimensions for each user. The features are scalably generated by processing over 45 billion interactions from social networks every day, as well as by incorporating factors that indicate real world influence. Supervised models trained from labeled data determine the weights for features, and the final Klout Score is obtained by hierarchically combining communities and networks. We validate the correctness of the score by showing that users with higher scores are able to spread information more effectively in a network. Finally, we use several comparisons to other ranking systems to show that highly influential and recognizable users across different domains have high Klout scores.

preprint2015arXiv

When-To-Post on Social Networks

For many users on social networks, one of the goals when broadcasting content is to reach a large audience. The probability of receiving reactions to a message differs for each user and depends on various factors, such as location, daily and weekly behavior patterns and the visibility of the message. While previous work has focused on overall network dynamics and message flow cascades, the problem of recommending personalized posting times has remained an underexplored topic of research. In this study, we formulate a when-to-post problem, where the objective is to find the best times for a user to post on social networks in order to maximize the probability of audience responses. To understand the complexity of the problem, we examine user behavior in terms of post-to-reaction times, and compare cross-network and cross-city weekly reaction behavior for users in different cities, on both Twitter and Facebook. We perform this analysis on over a billion posted messages and observed reactions, and propose multiple approaches for generating personalized posting schedules. We empirically assess these schedules on a sampled user set of 0.5 million active users and more than 25 million messages observed over a 56 day period. We show that users see a reaction gain of up to 17% on Facebook and 4% on Twitter when the recommended posting times are used. We open the dataset used in this study, which includes timestamps for over 144 million posts and over 1.1 billion reactions. The personalized schedules derived here are used in a fully deployed production system to recommend posting times for millions of users every day.