Source author record

Nazim Haouchine

Nazim Haouchine appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Computer Vision eess.IV

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works

2topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2026arXiv

Learn2Reg 2024: New Benchmark Datasets Driving Progress on New Challenges

Medical image registration is critical for clinical applications, and fair benchmarking of different methods is essential for monitoring ongoing progress in the field. To date, the Learn2Reg 2020-2023 challenges have released several complementary datasets and established metrics for evaluations. Building on this foundation, the 2024 edition expands the challenge's scope to cover a wider range of registration scenarios, particularly in terms of modality diversity and task complexity, by introducing three new tasks, including large-scale multi-modal registration and unsupervised inter-subject brain registration, as well as the first microscopy-focused benchmark within Learn2Reg. The new datasets also inspired new method developments, including invertibility constraints, pyramid features, keypoints alignment and instance optimisation. Visit Learn2Reg at https://learn2reg.grand-challenge.org.

preprint2020arXiv

Do Public Datasets Assure Unbiased Comparisons for Registration Evaluation?

With the increasing availability of new image registration approaches, an unbiased evaluation is becoming more needed so that clinicians can choose the most suitable approaches for their applications. Current evaluations typically use landmarks in manually annotated datasets. As a result, the quality of annotations is crucial for unbiased comparisons. Even though most data providers claim to have quality control over their datasets, an objective third-party screening can be reassuring for intended users. In this study, we use the variogram to screen the manually annotated landmarks in two datasets used to benchmark registration in image-guided neurosurgeries. The variogram provides an intuitive 2D representation of the spatial characteristics of annotated landmarks. Using variograms, we identified potentially problematic cases and had them examined by experienced radiologists. We found that (1) a small number of annotations may have fiducial localization errors; (2) the landmark distribution for some cases is not ideal to offer fair comparisons. If unresolved, both findings could incur bias in registration evaluation.