BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Nathan Wasser

Nathan Wasser contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Programming LanguagesLogic in Computer Science

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
2topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Deductive Verification of Programs with Underspecified Semantics by Model Extraction

We present a novel and well automatable approach to formal verification of programs with underspecified semantics, i.e., a language semantics that leaves open the order of certain evaluations. First, we reduce this problem to non-determinism of distributed systems, automatically extracting a distributed Active Object model from underspecified, sequential C code. This translation process provides a fully formal semantics for the considered C subset. In the extracted model every non-deterministic choice corresponds to one possible evaluation order. This step also automatically translates specifications in the ANSI/ISO C Specification Language (ACSL) into method contracts and object invariants for Active Objects. We then perform verification on the specified Active Objects model. For this we have implemented a theorem prover Crowbar based on the Behavioral Program Logic (BPL), which verifies the extracted model with respect to the translated specification and ensures the original property of the C code for all possible evaluation orders. By using model extraction, we can use standard tools, without designing a new complex program logic to deal with underspecification. The case study used is highly underspecified and cannot be verified with existing tools for C.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

The Right Kind of Non-Determinism: Using Concurrency to Verify C Programs with Underspecified Semantics

We present a novel and well automatable approach to formal verification of C programs with underspecified semantics, i.e., a language semantics that leaves open the order of certain evaluations. First, we reduce this problem to non-determinism of concurrent systems, automatically extracting a distributed Active Object model from underspecified, sequential C code. This translation process provides a fully formal semantics for the considered C subset. In the extracted model every non-deterministic choice corresponds to one possible evaluation order. This step also automatically translates specifications in the ANSI/ISO C Specification Language (ACSL) into method contracts and object invariants for Active Objects. We then perform verification on the specified Active Objects model, using the Crowbar theorem prover, which verifies the extracted model with respect to the translated specification and ensures the original property of the C code for all possible evaluation orders. By using model extraction, we can use standard tools, without designing a new complex program logic to deal with underspecification. The case study used is highly underspecified and cannot be handled correctly by existing tools for C.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Treating for-Loops as First-Class Citizens in Proofs

Indexed loop scopes have been shown to be a helpful tool in creating sound loop invariant rules in dynamic logic for programming languages with abrupt completion, such as Java. These rules do not require program transformation of the loop body, as other approaches to dealing with abrupt completion do. However, indexed loop scopes were designed specifically to provide a loop invariant rule for while loops and work rather opaquely. Here we propose replacing indexed loop scopes with a more transparent solution, which also lets us extend this idea from while loops to for loops. We further present sound loop unrolling rules for while, do and for loops, which require neither program transformation of the loop body, nor the use of nested modalities. This approach allows for loops to be treated as first-class citizens in proofs -- rather than the usual approach of transforming for loops into while loops -- which makes semi-automated proofs more transparent and easier to follow for the user, whose interactions may be required in order to close the proofs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access