BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Narayan Khadka

Narayan Khadka contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
astro-ph.COgr-qchep-phhep-thhep-ex

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
8works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

8 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Consistency study of high- and low-accreting Mg ii quasars: No significant effect of the Fe ii to Mg ii flux ratio on the radius-luminosity relation dispersion

We use observations of 66 reverberation-measured \Mgii\ quasars (QSOs) in the redshift range $0.36 \leq z \leq 1.686$ -- a subset of the 78 QSOs we previously studied that also have \rfe\ (flux ratio parameter of UV \Feii\ to \Mgii\ that is used as an accretion-rate proxy) measurements -- to simultaneously constrain cosmological model parameters and QSO 2-parameter and 3-parameter radius-luminosity ($R-L$) relation parameters in six different cosmological models. We find that these QSO $R-L$ relation parameters are independent of the assumed cosmological model and so these QSOs are standardizable through the $R-L$ relations. Also: (1) With the 2-parameter $R-L$ relation, we find that the low-\rfe\ and high-\rfe\ data subsets obey the same $R-L$ relation within the error bars. (2) Extending the 2-parameter $R-L$ relation to a 3-parameter one does not result in the hoped-for reduction in the intrinsic dispersion of the $R-L$ relation. (3) Neither of the 3-parameter $R-L$ relations provide a significantly better fit to the measurements than does the 2-parameter $R-L$ relation. These are promising results for the on-going development of \Mgii\ cosmological probes. The first and third of these results differ significantly from those we found elsewhere from analyses of reverberation-measured \hb\ QSOs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Do reverberation-measured H$β$ quasars provide a useful test of cosmology?

We use 118 H$β$ quasar (QSO) observations in the redshift range $0.0023 \leq z \leq 0.89$ to simultaneously constrain cosmological model parameters and QSO 2-parameter radius-luminosity ($R-L$) relation parameters in six different cosmological models. We find that the $R-L$ relation parameters for these QSOs are independent of the assumed cosmology so these QSOs seem to be standardizable through the $R-L$ relation (although there is a complication that might render this untrue). Cosmological constraints obtained using these QSOs are weak, more favor currently decelerated cosmological expansion, and typically are in $\sim 2σ$ tension with those obtained from a joint analysis of baryon acoustic oscillation and Hubble parameter measurements. Extending the $R-L$ relation to a 3-parameter one to try to correct for the accretion rate effect does not result in a reduction of the cosmological constraints discrepancy nor does it result in the hoped-for significant reduction of the intrinsic scatter of the $R-L$ relation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Using quasar and gamma-ray burst measurements to constrain cosmological dark energy models

Observational evidence for the accelerated expansion of the universe requires dark energy for its explanation if general relativity is an accurate model of gravity. However, dark energy is a mysterious quantity and we do not know much about its nature so understanding dark energy is an exciting scientific challenge. Cosmological dark energy models are fairly well tested in the low and high redshift parts of the universe. The highest of the low redshift, $z\sim2.3$, region is probed by baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) measurements and the only high redshift probe is the cosmic microwave background anisotropy which probes the $z\sim1100$ part of redshift space. In the intermediate redshift range $2.3 < z < 1100$ there are only a handful of observational probes and cosmological models are poorly tested in this region. In this thesis we constrain three pairs of general relativistic cosmological dark energy models using observational data which reach beyond the current BAO limit. We use quasar X-ray and UV flux measurements, the current version of these data span $0.009 \leq z \leq 7.5413$. We have discovered that most of these data cannot be standardized using the proposed method. However, the lower redshift part, $z \lesssim 1.5-1.7$, of these data are standardizable and can be used to derive lower-$z$ cosmological constraints. Another data set we use are gamma-ray burst measurements which span $0.3399 \leq z \leq 8.2$. Cosmological constraints derived from these data are significantly weaker than, but consistent with, those obtained from better-established cosmological probes. We also study and standardize 78 reverberation-measured Mg II time-lag quasars in the redshift range $0.0033 \leq z \leq 1.89$ by using their radius-luminosity relation. We also study 118 reverberation-measured H$β$ time-lag quasars which span $0.0023 \leq z \leq 0.89$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Do quasar X-ray and UV flux measurements provide a useful test of cosmological models?

The recent compilation of quasar (QSO) X-ray and UV flux measurements include QSOs that appear to not be standardizable via the X-ray luminosity and UV luminosity ($L_X-L_{UV}$) relation and so should not be used to constrain cosmological model parameters. Here we show that the largest of seven sub-samples in this compilation, the SDSS-4XMM QSOs that contribute about 2/3 of the total QSOs, have $L_X-L_{UV}$ relations that depend on the cosmological model assumed and also on redshift, and is the main cause of the similar problem discovered earlier for the full QSO compilation. The second and third biggest sub-samples, the SDSS-Chandra and XXL QSOs that together contribute about 30% of the total QSOs, appear standardizable, but provide only weak constraints on cosmological parameters that are not inconsistent with the standard spatially-flat $Λ$CDM model or with constraints from better-established cosmological probes.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Standardizing Dainotti-correlated gamma-ray bursts, and using them with standardized Amati-correlated gamma-ray bursts to constrain cosmological model parameters

We show that each of the three Dainotti-correlated gamma-ray burst (GRB) data sets recently compiled by Wang et al. and Hu et al., that together probe the redshift range $0.35 \leq z \leq 5.91$, obey cosmological-model-independent Dainotti correlation relations and so are standardizable. We use these GRB data in conjunction with the best currently-available Amati-correlated GRB data, that probe $0.3399 \leq z \leq 8.2$, to constrain cosmological model parameters. The resulting cosmological constraints are weak, providing lower limits on the non-relativistic matter density parameter, mildly favoring non-zero spatial curvature, and largely consistent with currently accelerated cosmological expansion as well as with constraints determined from better-established data.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Cosmological constraints from higher-redshift gamma-ray burst, HII starburst galaxy, and quasar (and other) data

We use higher-redshift gamma-ray burst (GRB), HII starburst galaxy (HIIG), and quasar angular size (QSO-AS) measurements to constrain six spatially flat and non-flat cosmological models. These three sets of cosmological constraints are mutually consistent. Cosmological constraints from a joint analysis of these data sets are largely consistent with currently-accelerating cosmological expansion as well as with cosmological constraints derived from a combined analysis of Hubble parameter ($H(z)$) and baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO, with Planck-determined baryonic matter density) measurements. A joint analysis of the $H(z)$ + BAO + QSO-AS + HIIG + GRB data provides fairly model-independent determinations of the non-relativistic matter density parameter $Ω_{\rm m_0}=0.313\pm0.013$ and the Hubble constant $H_0=69.3\pm1.2\ \rm{km \ s^{-1} \ Mpc^{-1}}$. These data are consistent with the dark energy being a cosmological constant and with spatial hypersurfaces being flat, but they do not rule out mild dark energy dynamics or a little spatial curvature. We also investigate the effect of including quasar flux measurements in the mix and find no novel conclusions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Quasar X-ray and UV flux, baryon acoustic oscillation, and Hubble parameter measurement constraints on cosmological model parameters

We use the Risaliti & Lusso (2015) compilation of 808 X-ray and UV flux measurements of quasars (QSOs) in the redshift range $0.061 \leq z \leq 6.28$, alone and in conjuction with baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) and Hubble parameter [$H(z)$] measurements, to constrain cosmological parameters in six cosmological models. The QSO data constraints are significantly weaker than, but consistent with, those from the $H(z)$ + BAO data. A joint analysis of the QSO + $H(z)$ + BAO data is consistent with the current standard model, spatially-flat $Λ$CDM, but mildly favors closed spatial hypersurfaces and dynamical dark energy.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Using quasar X-ray and UV flux measurements to constrain cosmological model parameters

Risaliti and Lusso have compiled X-ray and UV flux measurements of 1598 quasars (QSOs) in the redshift range $0.036 \leq z \leq 5.1003$, part of which, $z \sim 2.4 - 5.1$, is largely cosmologically unprobed. In this paper we use these QSO measurements, alone and in conjunction with baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) and Hubble parameter [$H(z)$] measurements, to constrain cosmological parameters in six different cosmological models, each with two different Hubble constant priors. In most of these models, given the larger uncertainties, the QSO cosmological parameter constraints are mostly consistent with those from the $H(z)$ + BAO data. A somewhat significant exception is the non-relativistic matter density parameter $Ω_{m0}$ where the QSO data favors $Ω_{m0} \sim 0.5 - 0.6$ in most models. Consequently in joint analyses of QSO data with $H(z)$ + BAO data the one-dimensional $Ω_{m0}$ distributions shift slightly toward larger values. A joint analysis of the QSO + $H(z)$ + BAO data is consistent with the current standard model, spatially-flat $Λ$CDM, but mildly favors closed spatial hypersurfaces and dynamical dark energy. Since the higher $Ω_{m0}$ values favored by the QSO data appear to be associated with the $z \sim 2 - 5$ part of these data, and conflict somewhat with strong indications for $Ω_{m0} \sim 0.3$ from most $z < 2.5$ data as well as from the cosmic microwave background anisotropy data at $z \sim 1100$, in most models, the larger QSO data $Ω_{m0}$ is possibly more indicative of an issue with the $z \sim 2 - 5$ QSO data than of an inadequacy of the standard flat $Λ$CDM model.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access