Source author record

Nandini Sahu

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

1works
1topics
2close collaborators

Published work

1 publications

preprint2021arXiv

Defining the (Black Hole)-Spheroid Connection with the Discovery of Morphology-Dependent Substructure in the MBHM_{\rm BH}--nsph\rm n_{sph} and MBHM_{\rm BH}--Re,sph\rm R_{e, sph} Diagrams: New Tests for Advanced Theories and Realistic Simulations

For 123 local galaxies with directly-measured black hole masses (MBHM_{\rm BH}), we provide the host spheroid's Sérsic index (nsph\rm n_{sph}), effective half-light radius (Re,sph\rm R_{e,sph}), and effective surface brightness (μeμ_e), obtained from careful multi-component decompositions, and we use these to derive the morphology-dependent MBHM_{\rm BH}--nsph\rm n_{sph} and MBHM_{\rm BH}--Re,sph\rm R_{e,sph} relations. We additionally present the morphology-dependent M∗,sphM_{\rm *,sph}--nsph\rm n_{sph} and M∗,sphM_{\rm *,sph}--Re,sph\rm R_{e,sph} relations. We explored differences due to: early-type galaxies (ETGs) versus late-type galaxies (LTGs); Sérsic versus core-Sérsic galaxies; barred versus non-barred galaxies; and galaxies with and without a stellar disk. We detect two different MBHM_{\rm BH}--nsph\rm n_{sph} relations due to ETGs and LTGs with power-law slopes 3.95±0.343.95\pm0.34 and 2.85±0.312.85\pm 0.31. We additionally quantified the correlation between MBHM_{\rm BH} and the spheroid's central concentration index, which varies monotonically with the Sérsic index. Furthermore, we observe a single, near-linear M∗,sphM_{\rm *,sph}--Re,sph1.08±0.04\rm R_{e,sph}^{1.08\pm 0.04} relation for ETGs and LTGs, which encompasses both classical and alleged pseudobulges. In contrast, ETGs and LTGs define two distinct MBHM_{\rm BH}--Re,sph\rm R_{e,sph} relations with Δrms∣BH∼0.60 dexΔ_{\rm rms|BH}\sim\rm 0.60~dex (cf.\ ∼\sim0.51~dex for the MBHM_{\rm BH}--σσ relation and ∼\sim0.58~dex for the MBHM_{\rm BH}--M∗,sphM_{\rm *,sph} relation), and the ETGs alone define two steeper MBHM_{\rm BH}--Re,sph\rm R_{e,sph} relations, offset by ∼\sim1~dex in the log⁡MBH\log M_{\rm BH}-direction, depending on whether they have a disk or not and explaining their similar offset in the MBHM_{\rm BH}--M∗,sphM_{\rm *,sph} diagram. This trend holds using 10%10 \%, 50%50 \%, or 90%90 \% radii.(Abridged)

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.