Researcher profile

Namkee Oh

Namkee Oh contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

CurConMix+: A Unified Spatio-Temporal Framework for Hierarchical Surgical Workflow Understanding

Surgical action triplet recognition aims to understand fine-grained surgical behaviors by modeling the interactions among instruments, actions, and anatomical targets. Despite its clinical importance for workflow analysis and skill assessment, progress has been hindered by severe class imbalance, subtle visual variations, and the semantic interdependence among triplet components. Existing approaches often address only a subset of these challenges rather than tackling them jointly, which limits their ability to form a holistic understanding. This study builds upon CurConMix, a spatial representation framework. At its core, a curriculum-guided contrastive learning strategy learns discriminative and progressively correlated features, further enhanced by structured hard-pair sampling and feature-level mixup. Its temporal extension, CurConMix+, integrates a Multi-Resolution Temporal Transformer (MRTT) that achieves robust, context-aware understanding by adaptively fusing multi-scale temporal features and dynamically balancing spatio-temporal cues. Furthermore, we introduce LLS48, a new, hierarchically annotated benchmark for complex laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy, providing step-, task-, and action-level annotations. Extensive experiments on CholecT45 and LLS48 demonstrate that CurConMix+ not only outperforms state-of-the-art approaches in triplet recognition, but also exhibits strong cross-level generalization, as its fine-grained features effectively transfer to higher-level phase and step recognition tasks. Together, the framework and dataset provide a unified foundation for hierarchy-aware, reproducible, and interpretable surgical workflow understanding. The code and dataset will be publicly released on GitHub to facilitate reproducibility and further research.

preprint2026arXiv

SurgCheck: Do Vision-Language Models Really Look at Images in Surgical VQA?

Purpose: Vision-language models (VLMs) have shown promising performance in surgical visual question answering (VQA). However, existing surgical VQA datasets often contain linguistic shortcuts, where question phrasing implicitly constrains the answer space. It remains unclear whether reported performance reflects visual understanding or reliance on such linguistic shortcuts. Methods: We introduce SurgCheck, a diagnostic benchmark for quantifying linguistic shortcut reliance in surgical VQA. SurgCheck employs a paired-question design in which each surgical frame is associated with an original question containing entity names and a less-biased counterpart that removes these names while preserving identical visual content and ground-truth answers. The resulting performance gap provides a diagnostic signal of shortcut reliance. To ensure that the less-biased question remains well-defined even without entity names, four grounding cues are incorporated: bounding box, arrow, spatial position, and periphrasis. We evaluate both general-purpose and surgical-specific VLMs under zero-shot and fine-tuned settings on SurgCheck. To evaluate open-ended zero-shot responses, we introduce an LLM-as-a-judge evaluation protocol. Results: Using SurgCheck, we observe consistent performance degradation on less-biased questions across five VLMs, despite identical visual inputs. Text-only ablation reveals minimal performance drops for action and target prediction, indicating that action and target prediction is largely driven by linguistic shortcuts rather than visual reasoning. Conclusion: SurgCheck provides a controlled diagnostic framework that exposes failure modes masked by linguistic bias in existing surgical VQA benchmarks. Our findings demonstrate that strong benchmark performance does not necessarily imply faithful visual understanding, underscoring the need for bias-aware evaluation in surgical VQA.