BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Nachum Dershowitz

Nachum Dershowitz contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Logic in Computer ScienceDiscrete MathematicsInformation Retrievalmath.COComputation and LanguageCryptography and Securitycs.CYData Structures and AlgorithmsDigital LibrariesGeneral LiteratureProgramming Languages

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
12works
0followers
11topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

12 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Domain-Independent Deception: Definition, Taxonomy and the Linguistic Cues Debate

Internet-based economies and societies are drowning in deceptive attacks. These attacks take many forms, such as fake news, phishing, and job scams, which we call "domains of deception." Machine-learning and natural-language-processing researchers have been attempting to ameliorate this precarious situation by designing domain-specific detectors. Only a few recent works have considered domain-independent deception. We collect these disparate threads of research and investigate domain-independent deception along four dimensions. First, we provide a new computational definition of deception and formalize it using probability theory. Second, we break down deception into a new taxonomy. Third, we analyze the debate on linguistic cues for deception and supply guidelines for systematic reviews. Fourth, we provide some evidence and some suggestions for domain-independent deception detection.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Between Broadway and the Hudson: A Bijection of Corridor Paths

We present a substantial generalization of the equinumeracy of grand Dyck paths and Dyck-path prefixes, constrained within a band. The number of constrained paths starting at level $i$ and ending in a window of size $2j+2$ is equal to the number starting at level $j$ and ending in a window of size $2i+2$ centered around the same point. A new encoding of lattice paths provides a bijective proof.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Fast Search with Poor OCR

The indexing and searching of historical documents have garnered attention in recent years due to massive digitization efforts of important collections worldwide. Pure textual search in these corpora is a problem since optical character recognition (OCR) is infamous for performing poorly on such historical material, which often suffer from poor preservation. We propose a novel text-based method for searching through noisy text. Our system represents words as vectors, projects queries and candidates obtained from the OCR into a common space, and ranks the candidates using a metric suited to nearest-neighbor search. We demonstrate the practicality of our method on typewritten German documents from the WWII era.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Nonleaf Patterns in Trees: Protected Nodes and Fine Numbers

A closed-form formula is derived for the number of occurrences of matches of a multiset of patterns among all ordered (plane-planted) trees with a given number of edges. A pattern looks like a tree, with internal nodes and leaves, but also contain components that match subtrees or sequences of subtrees. This result extends previous versatile tree-pattern enumeration formulae to incorporate components that are only allowed to match nonleaf subtrees and provides enumerations of trees by the number of protected (shortest outgoing path has two or more edges) or unprotected nodes.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2005arXiv

Comparing Computational Power

It is common practice to compare the computational power of different models of computation. For example, the recursive functions are strictly more powerful than the primitive recursive functions, because the latter are a proper subset of the former (which includes Ackermann's function). Side-by-side with this "containment" method of measuring power, it is standard to use an approach based on "simulation". For example, one says that the (untyped) lambda calculus is as powerful--computationally speaking--as the partial recursive functions, because the lambda calculus can simulate all partial recursive functions by encoding the natural numbers as Church numerals. The problem is that unbridled use of these two ways of comparing power allows one to show that some computational models are strictly stronger than themselves! We argue that a better definition is that model A is strictly stronger than B if A can simulate B via some encoding, whereas B cannot simulate A under any encoding. We then show that the recursive functions are strictly stronger in this sense than the primitive recursive. We also prove that the recursive functions, partial recursive functions, and Turing machines are "complete", in the sense that no injective encoding can make them equivalent to any "hypercomputational" model.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2000arXiv

A General Framework for Automatic Termination Analysis of Logic Programs

This paper describes a general framework for automatic termination analysis of logic programs, where we understand by ``termination'' the finitenes s of the LD-tree constructed for the program and a given query. A general property of mappings from a certain subset of the branches of an infinite LD-tree into a finite set is proved. From this result several termination theorems are derived, by using different finite sets. The first two are formulated for the predicate dependency and atom dependency graphs. Then a general result for the case of the query-mapping pairs relevant to a program is proved (cf. \cite{Sagiv,Lindenstrauss:Sagiv}). The correctness of the {\em TermiLog} system described in \cite{Lindenstrauss:Sagiv:Serebrenik} follows from it. In this system it is not possible to prove termination for programs involving arithmetic predicates, since the usual order for the integers is not well-founded. A new method, which can be easily incorporated in {\em TermiLog} or similar systems, is presented, which makes it possible to prove termination for programs involving arithmetic predicates. It is based on combining a finite abstraction of the integers with the technique of the query-mapping pairs, and is essentially capable of dividing a termination proof into several cases, such that a simple termination function suffices for each case. Finally several possible extensions are outlined.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access