BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Muneer Ahmad

Muneer Ahmad contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Digital LibrariesInformation Retrieval

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Global research trends and collaborations in Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva: A bibliometric analysis (1989-2023)

Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP) is a rare and debilitating genetic disorder characterized by the progressive formation of bone in muscles and connective tissues. This scientometric analysis examines the global research trends on FOP between 1989 and 2023 using bibliographic data from Web of Science. The study highlights key patterns in publication productivity, influential journals, institutions, and the geographical distribution of research. The findings reveal that the United States leads both in terms of total publications and citation impact, with significant contributions from the UK, Italy, Japan, and other European countries. Additionally, the analysis identifies the major document types, including articles and reviews, and evaluates the collaborative efforts across institutions. The study offers valuable insights into the global research landscape of FOP, providing a foundation for future studies and international collaborations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Lotka's Law and Authorship Distribution in Coronary Artery Disease Research in South Africa

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a major cause of death and disability in developed countries. Although CAD mortality rates worldwide have declined over the past 4 decades, CAD remains responsible for approximately one-third or more of all deaths in individuals over age 35, and it has been estimated that nearly half of all middle-aged men and one-third of middle aged women in the United States will develop clinical CAD. The present paper attempts to check the applicability of Lotka's Law on South African publication on Coronary artery disease research. The study lights on Lotka's empirical law of scientific productivity, i.e., Inverse Square Law, to measure the scientific productivity of authors, to test Lotka's Exponent value and the K.S test for the fitness of Lotka's Law.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Mapping of Publications Productivity on Journal of Documentation 1989-2018: A Study Based on Clarivate Analytics-Web of Science Database

The Present Study analyzed research productivity in Journal of Documentation (JDoc) for a period of 30 years between 1989 and 2018. Web of Science database a service from Clarivate Analytics has been used to download citation and source data. Bibexcel and Histcite application software have been used to present the datasets. Analysis part focuses on the parameters like citation impact at local and global level, influential authors and their total output, ranking of contributing institutions and countries. In addition to this scientographical mapping of data is presented through graphs using VOSviewer software mapping technique.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Publication Trend in an Indian Journal and a Pakistan Journal: A Comparative Analysis using Scientometric Approach

Scientometric analysis of 146 and 59 research articles published in Indian journal of Information Sources and Services (IJISS) and Pakistan Journal of Library and Information Science has been carried out. Seven Volumes of the IJISS containing 14 issues and Seven volumes of PJLIS containing 8 issues from 2011 - 2017 have been taken into consideration for the present study. The number of contributions, authorship pattern & author productivity, average citations, average length of articles, average keywords and collaborative papers has been analyzed. Out of 146 of IJISS contributions, only 39 are single authored and rest by multi authored with degree of collaboration 0.73 and week collaboration among the authors and from 59 contributions of PJLIS only 18 are single authored and rest by multi authored with degree of collaboration 0.69 and week collaboration among the authors. The study revealed that the author productivity is 0.53 (IJISS) and 0.50 (PJLIS) and dominated by the Indian and Pakistani authors.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Testing Lotka's Law and Pattern of Author Productivity in the Scholarly Publications of Artificial Intelligence

Artificial intelligence has changed our day to day life in multitude ways. AI technology is rearing itself as a driving force to be reckoned with in the largest industries in the world. AI has already engulfed our educational system, our businesses and our financial establishments. The future is definite that machines with artificial intelligence will soon be captivating over trained manual work that now is mostly cared by humans. Machines can carry out human-like tasks by new inputs as artificial intelligence makes it possible for machines to learn from experience. AI data from web of science database from 2008 to 2017 have been mapped to depict the average growth rate, relative growth rate, contribution made by authors in the view of research productivity, authorship pattern and collaboration of AI literature. The Lotka's law on authorship productivity of AI literature has been tested to confirm the applicability of the law to the present data set. A K-S test was applied to measure the degree of agreement between the distribution of the observed set of data against the inverse general power relationship and the theoretical value of α =2. It is found that the inverse square law of Lotka follow as such.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access