Source author record

Mowaffaq Hajja

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

math.AC math.MG

Catalog footprint

Research overview

2works

2topics

3close collaborators

Actions

Is this your work?

Open graph Browse papers

preprint2017arXiv

Irreducibility of the Cayley-Menger determinant, and of a class of related polynomials

If $S$ is a given regular $n$ -simplex, $n \ge 2$ , of edge length $a$ , then the distances $a_1$ , $\cdots$ , $a_{n+1}$ of an arbitrary point in its affine hull to its vertices are related by the fairly known elegant relation $ϕ_{n+1} (a,a_1,\cdots,a_{n+1})=0$ , where $ϕ= ϕ_t (x, x_1,\cdots,x_{n+1}) = \left( x^2+x_1^2+\cdots+x_{n+1}^2\right)^2 - t\left( x^4+x_1^4+\cdots+x_{n+1}^4\right).$ The natural question whether this is essentially the only relation is answered positively by M. Hajja, M. Hayajneh, B. Nguyen, and Sh. Shaqaqha in a recently submitted paper entitled "Distances from the vertices of a regular simplex." In that paper, the authors made use of the irreducibility of the polynomial $ϕ$ in the case when $n \ge 2$ , $t=n+1$ , $x= a \ne 0$ , and $k = \mathbb{R}$ , but supplied no proof, promising to do so in another paper that is turning out to be this one. It is thus the main aim of this paper to establish that irreducibility. In fact, we treat the irreducibility of $ϕ$ without restrictions on $t$ , $x$ , $a$ , and $k$ . As a by-product, we obtain new proofs of results pertaining to the irreducibility of the general Cayley-Menger determinant that are more general than those established by C. D'Andrea and M. Sombra in Sib. J. Math. 46, 71--76.

preprint2016arXiv

Distances from the vertices of a regular simplex

If $S$ is a given regular $d$ -simplex of edge length $a$ in the $d$ -dimensional Euclidean space $\mathcal{E}$ , then the distances $t_1$ , $\cdots$ , $t_{d+1}$ of an arbitrary point in $\mathcal{E}$ to the vertices of $S$ are related by the elegant relation $(d+1)\left( a^4+t_1^4+\cdots+t_{d+1}^4\right)=\left( a^2+t_1^2+\cdots+t_{d+1}^2\right)^2.$ The purpose of this paper is to prove that this is essentially the only relation that exists among $t_1,\cdots,t_{d+1}.$ The proof uses tools from analysis, algebra, and geometry.

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.