Researcher profile

Monroe Eskew

Monroe Eskew contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
1topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Strong independence and its spectrum

For $μ, κ$ infinite, say $\mathcal{A}\subseteq [κ]^κ$ is a $(μ,κ)$-maximal independent family if whenever $\mathcal{A}_0$ and $\mathcal{A}_1$ are pairwise disjoint non-empty in $[\mathcal{A}]^{<μ}$ then $\bigcap\mathcal{A}_0\backslash\bigcup\mathcal{A}_1 \not= \emptyset$, $\mathcal{A}$ is maximal under inclusion among families with this property, and moreover all such Booelan combinations have size $κ$. We denote by $\mathfrak{sp}_{\mathfrak i}(μ,κ)$ the set of all cardinalities of such families, and if non-empty, we let $\mathfrak{i}_μ(κ)$ be its minimal element. Thus, $\mathfrak{i}_μ(κ)$ (if defined) is a natural higher analogue of the independence number on $ω$ for the higher Baire spaces. In this paper, we study $\mathfrak{sp}_{\mathfrak i}(μ,κ)$ for $μ,κ$ uncountable. Among others, we show that: (1) The property $\mathfrak{sp}_{\mathfrak i}(μ,κ)\neq\emptyset$ cannot be decided on the basis of ZFC plus large cardinals. (2) Relative to a measurable, it is consistent that: (a) $(\exists κ{>}ω) \, \mathfrak{i}_κ(κ)<2^κ$; (b) $(\exists κ{>}ω)\,κ^+<\mathfrak{i}_{ω_1}(κ)<2^κ$. To the best knowledge of the authors, this is the first example of a $(μ,κ)$-maximal independent family of size strictly between $κ^+$ and $2^κ$, for uncountable $κ$. (3) $\mathfrak{sp}_{\mathfrak i}(μ,κ)$ cannot be quite arbitrary.

preprint2020arXiv

Nonregular ideals

Generalizing Keisler&#39;s notion of regularity for ultrafilters, Taylor introduced degrees of regularity for ideals and showed that a countably complete nonregular ideal on $ω_1$ must be somewhere $ω_1$-dense. We prove a dichotomy about degrees of regularity for $κ$-complete ideals on successor cardinals $κ$ and apply this to show that Taylor&#39;s Theorem does not generalize to higher cardinals. In particular, the existence of a nonregular ideal on $ω_2$ does not imply the existence of an $ω_2$-dense ideal on $ω_2$. We obtain similar results for normal ideals on $\mathcal P_κ(λ)$.