Source author record

Monroe Eskew

Monroe Eskew appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

6works
1topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Strong independence and its spectrum

For $μ, κ$ infinite, say $\mathcal{A}\subseteq [κ]^κ$ is a $(μ,κ)$-maximal independent family if whenever $\mathcal{A}_0$ and $\mathcal{A}_1$ are pairwise disjoint non-empty in $[\mathcal{A}]^{<μ}$ then $\bigcap\mathcal{A}_0\backslash\bigcup\mathcal{A}_1 \not= \emptyset$, $\mathcal{A}$ is maximal under inclusion among families with this property, and moreover all such Booelan combinations have size $κ$. We denote by $\mathfrak{sp}_{\mathfrak i}(μ,κ)$ the set of all cardinalities of such families, and if non-empty, we let $\mathfrak{i}_μ(κ)$ be its minimal element. Thus, $\mathfrak{i}_μ(κ)$ (if defined) is a natural higher analogue of the independence number on $ω$ for the higher Baire spaces. In this paper, we study $\mathfrak{sp}_{\mathfrak i}(μ,κ)$ for $μ,κ$ uncountable. Among others, we show that: (1) The property $\mathfrak{sp}_{\mathfrak i}(μ,κ)\neq\emptyset$ cannot be decided on the basis of ZFC plus large cardinals. (2) Relative to a measurable, it is consistent that: (a) $(\exists κ{>}ω) \, \mathfrak{i}_κ(κ)<2^κ$; (b) $(\exists κ{>}ω)\,κ^+<\mathfrak{i}_{ω_1}(κ)<2^κ$. To the best knowledge of the authors, this is the first example of a $(μ,κ)$-maximal independent family of size strictly between $κ^+$ and $2^κ$, for uncountable $κ$. (3) $\mathfrak{sp}_{\mathfrak i}(μ,κ)$ cannot be quite arbitrary.

preprint2020arXiv

Nonregular ideals

Generalizing Keisler's notion of regularity for ultrafilters, Taylor introduced degrees of regularity for ideals and showed that a countably complete nonregular ideal on $ω_1$ must be somewhere $ω_1$-dense. We prove a dichotomy about degrees of regularity for $κ$-complete ideals on successor cardinals $κ$ and apply this to show that Taylor's Theorem does not generalize to higher cardinals. In particular, the existence of a nonregular ideal on $ω_2$ does not imply the existence of an $ω_2$-dense ideal on $ω_2$. We obtain similar results for normal ideals on $\mathcal P_κ(λ)$.