Source author record

Monik Khare

Monik Khare appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
3topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2013arXiv

First-Come-First-Served for Online Slot Allocation and Huffman Coding

Can one choose a good Huffman code on the fly, without knowing the underlying distribution? Online Slot Allocation (OSA) models this and similar problems: There are n slots, each with a known cost. There are n items. Requests for items are drawn i.i.d. from a fixed but hidden probability distribution p. After each request, if the item, i, was not previously requested, then the algorithm (knowing the slot costs and the requests so far, but not p) must place the item in some vacant slot j(i). The goal is to minimize the sum, over the items, of the probability of the item times the cost of its assigned slot. The optimal offline algorithm is trivial: put the most probable item in the cheapest slot, the second most probable item in the second cheapest slot, etc. The optimal online algorithm is First Come First Served (FCFS): put the first requested item in the cheapest slot, the second (distinct) requested item in the second cheapest slot, etc. The optimal competitive ratios for any online algorithm are 1+H(n-1) ~ ln n for general costs and 2 for concave costs. For logarithmic costs, the ratio is, asymptotically, 1: FCFS gives cost opt + O(log opt). For Huffman coding, FCFS yields an online algorithm (one that allocates codewords on demand, without knowing the underlying probability distribution) that guarantees asymptotically optimal cost: at most opt + 2 log(1+opt) + 2.

preprint2012arXiv

Caching with rental cost and zapping

The \emph{file caching} problem is defined as follows. Given a cache of size $k$ (a positive integer), the goal is to minimize the total retrieval cost for the given sequence of requests to files. A file $f$ has size $size(f)$ (a positive integer) and retrieval cost $cost(f)$ (a non-negative number) for bringing the file into the cache. A \emph{miss} or \emph{fault} occurs when the requested file is not in the cache and the file has to be retrieved into the cache by paying the retrieval cost, and some other file may have to be removed (\emph{evicted}) from the cache so that the total size of the files in the cache does not exceed $k$. We study the following variants of the online file caching problem. \textbf{\emph{Caching with Rental Cost} (or \emph{Rental Caching})}: There is a rental cost $λ$ (a positive number) for each file in the cache at each time unit. The goal is to minimize the sum of the retrieval costs and the rental costs. \textbf{\emph{Caching with Zapping}}: A file can be \emph{zapped} by paying a zapping cost $N \ge 1$. Once a file is zapped, all future requests of the file don't incur any cost. The goal is to minimize the sum of the retrieval costs and the zapping costs. We study these two variants and also the variant which combines these two (rental caching with zapping). We present deterministic lower and upper bounds in the competitive-analysis framework. We study and extend the online covering algorithm from \citep{young02online} to give deterministic online algorithms. We also present randomized lower and upper bounds for some of these problems.