BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Mohsen Sadatsafavi

Mohsen Sadatsafavi contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Applications

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Minding non-collapsibility of odds ratios when recalibrating risk prediction models

In clinical prediction modeling, model updating refers to the practice of modifying a prediction model before it is used in a new setting. In the context of logistic regression for a binary outcome, one of the simplest updating methods is a fixed odds-ratio transformation of predicted risks to improve calibration-in-the-large. Previous authors have proposed equations for calculating this odds-ratio based on the discrepancy between the prevalence in the original and the new population, or between the average of predicted and observed risks. We show that this method fails to consider the non-collapsibility of odds-ratio. Consequently, it under-corrects predicted risks, especially when predicted risks are more dispersed (i.e., for models with good discrimination). We suggest an approximate equation for recovering the conditional odds-ratio from the mean and variance of predicted risks. Brief simulations and a case study show that this approach reduces under-correction, sometimes substantially. R code for implementation is provided.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Uncertainty and Value of Information in Risk Prediction Modeling

Background: Due to the finite size of the development sample, predicted probabilities from a risk prediction model are inevitably uncertain. We apply Value of Information methodology to evaluate the decision-theoretic implications of prediction uncertainty. Methods: Adopting a Bayesian perspective, we extend the definition of the Expected Value of Perfect Information (EVPI) from decision analysis to net benefit calculations in risk prediction. In the context of model development, EVPI is the expected gain in net benefit by using the correct predictions as opposed to predictions from a proposed model. We suggest bootstrap methods for sampling from the posterior distribution of predictions for EVPI calculation using Monte Carlo simulations. In a case study, we used subsets of data of various sizes from a clinical trial for predicting mortality after myocardial infarction to show how EVPI changes with sample size. Results: With a sample size of 1,000 and at the pre-specified threshold of 2% on predicted risks, the gain in net benefit by using the proposed and the correct models were 0.0006 and 0.0011, respectively, resulting in an EVPI of 0.0005 and a relative EVPI of 87%. EVPI was zero only at unrealistically high thresholds (>85%). As expected, EVPI declined with larger samples. We summarize an algorithm for incorporating EVPI calculations into the commonly used bootstrap method for optimism correction. Conclusion: Value of Information methods can be applied to explore decision-theoretic consequences of uncertainty in risk prediction and can complement inferential methods when developing risk prediction models. R code for implementing this method is provided.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

A threshold-free summary index for quantifying the capacity of covariates to yield efficient treatment rules

The focus of this paper is on quantifying the capacity of covariates in devising efficient treatment rules when data from a randomized trial are available. Conventional one-variable-at-a-time subgroup analysis based on statistical hypothesis testing of covariate-by-treatment interaction is ill-suited for this purpose. The application of decision theory results in treatment rules that compare the expected benefit of treatment given the patient's covariates against a treatment threshold. However, determining treatment threshold is often context-specific, and any given threshold might seem arbitrary at the reporting stages of a clinical trial. We propose a threshold-free metric that quantifies the capacity of a set of covariates towards finding individuals who will benefit the most from treatment. The construct of the proposed metric is comparing the expected outcomes with and without knowledge of covariates when one of a two randomly selected patients are to be treated. We show that the resulting index can also be expressed in terms of integrated treatment benefit as a function of covariates over the entire range of treatment thresholds. We also propose a semi-parametric estimation method suitable for out-of-sample validation and adjustment for optimism. We use data from a clinical trial of preventive antibiotic therapy for reducing exacerbation rate in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease to demonstrate the calculations in a step-by-step fashion. The proposed index has intuitive and theoretically sound interpretation and can be estimated with relative ease for a wide class of regression models. Beyond the conceptual developments presented in this work, various aspects of estimation and inference for such metrics need to be pursued in future research.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access