Researcher profile

Mohammad I. Radaideh

Mohammad I. Radaideh contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 11 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
1works
0followers
1topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2019arXiv

Application of Stochastic and Deterministic Techniques for Uncertainty Quantification and Sensitivity Analysis of Energy Systems

Sensitivity analysis (SA) and uncertainty quantification (UQ) are used to assess and improve engineering models. In this study, various methods of SA and UQ are described and applied in theoretical and practical examples for use in energy system analysis. This paper includes local SA (one-at-a-time linear perturbation), global SA (Morris screening), variance decomposition (Sobol indices), and regression-based SA. For UQ, stochastic methods (Monte Carlo sampling) and deterministic methods (using SA profiles) are used. Simple test problems are included to demonstrate the described methods where input parameter interactions, linear correlation, model nonlinearity, local sensitivity, output uncertainty, and variance contribution are explored. Practical applications of analyzing the efficiency and power output uncertainty of a molten carbonate fuel cell (MCFC) are conducted. Using different methods, the uncertainty in the MCFC responses is about 10%. Both SA and UQ methods agree on the importance ranking of the fuel cell operating temperature and cathode activation energy as the most influential parameters. Both parameters contribute to more than 90% of the maximum power and efficiency variance. The methods applied in this paper can be used to achieve a comprehensive mathematical understanding of a particular energy model, which can lead to better performance.