Source author record

Mitchell T. Dennis

Mitchell T. Dennis appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
4topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Impact of Simultaneous Stellar Modeling Uncertainties on the Tip of the Red Giant Branch for Axion-Election Coupling

We present a novel method for incorporating the effects of stellar modeling uncertainties into constraints on the axion-electron coupling constant found using the observed calibration of the tip of the red giant branch (TRGB) I band magnitude $M_I$.~We simulate grids of models with varying initial stellar mass, helium abundance, metallicity, and axion-electron coupling $α_{26}= 10^{26} g^2_{ae}/4π$ but different (fixed) mixing lengths and mass loss efficiencies.~We then train separate machine learning emulators to predict $M_I$ as a function of the varying parameters for each grid.~Our emulators enable the use of Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulations where $α_{26}$ is varied simultaneously with the stellar parameters.~One of our grids yields a bound $α_{26}\leq 0.75$ at the 95\% confidence limit, a factor of $\sim3.7$ weaker than previous bounds;~while the other grid yields $α_{26}\leq1.58$ at the 95\% confidence limit, a factor $\sim7.8$ weaker than previous bounds.~We demonstrate that the different values we find are due to covariances between stellar and axion physics that are not accounted for by single parameter variations.~Our results suggest that the bound on $α_{26}$ derived using empirical calibrations of the TRGB I band magnitude need to be reevaluated using simultaneous parameter variation.~Alternative methods that use the bolometric luminosity instead of $M_I$ are more robust because they are not reliant upon theoretical predictions of the effective temperature.