Researcher profile

Mirjam Augstein

Mirjam Augstein contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Revisiting Interest Indicators Derived from Web Reading Behavior for Implicit User Modeling

Today, intelligent user interfaces on the web often come in form of recommendation services tailoring content to individual users. Recommendation of web content such as news articles often requires a certain amount of explicit ratings to allow for satisfactory results, i.e., the selection of content actually relevant for the user. Yet, the collection of such explicit ratings is time-consuming and dependent on users' willingness to provide the required information on a regular basis. Thus, using implicit interest indicators can be a helpful complementation to relying on explicitly entered information only. Analysis of reading behavior on the web can be the basis for the derivation of such implicit indicators. Previous work has already identified several indicators and discussed how they can be used as a basis for user models. However, most earlier work is either of conceptual nature and does not involve studies to prove the suggested concepts or relies on meanwhile potentially outdated technology. All earlier discussions of the topic further have in common that they do not yet consider mobile contexts. This paper builds upon earlier work, however providing a major update regarding technology and web reading context, distinguishing between desktop and mobile settings. This update also allowed us to identify a set of new indicators that so far have not yet been discussed. This paper describes (i) our technical work, a framework for analyzing user interactions with the browser relying on latest web technologies, (ii) the implicit interest indicators we either revisited or newly identified, and (iii) the results of an online study on web reading behavior as a basis for derivation of interest we conducted with 96 participants.

preprint2022arXiv

What was Hybrid? A Systematic Review of Hybrid Collaboration and Meetings Research

Interest in hybrid collaboration and meetings (HCM), where several co-located participants engage in coordinated work with remote participants, is gaining unprecedented momentum after the rapid shift in working from home due to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, while the interest is new, researchers have been exploring HCM phenomena for decades, albeit dispersed across diverse research traditions, using different terms, definitions, and frameworks. In this article, we present a systematic literature review of the contexts and tools of HCM in the ACM Digital Library. We obtained approximately 1,200 results, which were narrowed down to 62 key articles. We report on the terms, citations, venues, authors, domains, study types, and data of these publications and present a taxonomic overview based on their reported hybrid settings' actual characteristics. We discuss why the SLR resulted in a relatively small number of publications, and then as a corollary, discuss how some excluded high-profile publications flesh out the SLR findings to provide important additional concepts. The SLR itself covers the ACM until November 2019, so our discussion also includes relevant 2020 and 2021 publications. The end result is a baseline that researchers and designers can use in shaping the post-COVID-19 future of HCM systems.