BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Minh Hoang Trinh

Minh Hoang Trinh contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Systems and Controleess.SYmath.DSmath.OCMultiagent SystemsSocial and Information Networks

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Matrix-Scaled Consensus

This paper proposes matrix-scaled consensus algorithm, which generalizes the scaled consensus algorithm in \cite{Roy2015scaled}. In (scalar) scaled consensus algorithms, the agents' states do not converge to a common value, but to different points along a straight line in the state space, which depends on the scaling factors and the initial states of the agents. In the matrix-scaled consensus algorithm, a positive/negative definite matrix weight is assigned to each agent. Each agent updates its state based on the product of the sum of relative matrix scaled states and the sign of the matrix weight. Under the proposed algorithm, each agent asymptotically converges to a final point differing with a common consensus point by the inverse of its own scaling matrix. Thus, the final states of the agents are not restricted to a straight line but are extended to an open subspace of the state-space. Convergence analysis of matrix-scaled consensus for single and double-integrator agents are studied in detail. Simulation results are given to support the analysis.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Continuous-time Opinion Dynamics on Multiple Interdependent Topics

In this paper, and inspired by the recent discrete-time model in [1,2], we study two continuous-time opinion dynamics models (Model 1 and Model 2) where the individuals discuss opinions on multiple logically interdependent topics. The logical interdependence between the different topics is captured by a `logic' matrix, which is distinct from the Laplacian matrix capturing interactions between individuals. For each of Model 1 and Model 2, we obtain a necessary and sufficient condition for the network to reach to a consensus on each separate topic. The condition on Model 1 involves a combination of the eigenvalues of the logic matrix and Laplacian matrix, whereas the condition on Model 2 requires only separate conditions on the logic matrix and Laplacian matrix. Further investigations of Model 1 yields two sufficient conditions for consensus, and allow us to conclude that one way to guarantee a consensus is to reduce the rate of interaction between individuals exchanging opinions. By placing further restrictions on the logic matrix, we also establish a set of Laplacian matrices which guarantee consensus for Model 1. The two models are also expanded to include stubborn individuals, who remain attached to their initial opinions. Sufficient conditions are obtained for guaranteeing convergence of the opinion dynamics system, with the final opinions generally being at a persistent disagreement. Simulations are provided to illustrate the results.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access