BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Ming-Xian Zhao

Ming-Xian Zhao appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
astro-ph.EPphysics.space-phastro-ph.SR

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Can we estimate the intensities of great geomagnetic storms($Δ$SYM-H$\le -$200 nT) by Burton equation or by O'Brien and McPherron equation?

We input solar wind parameters responsible for the main phases of 15 great geomagnetic storms (GGSs: $Δ$SYM-H$\le-$200 nT) into the empirical formulae created by \cite{Burton1975}(hereafter Burton equation), and by \cite{OBrien2000}(hereafter OM equation) to evaluate whether \textbf{two equations} can correctly estimate the intensities of GGSs. The results show that the intensities of most GGSs estimated by OM equation are much smaller than the observed intensities. The RMS error between the intensities estimated by OM equation and the observed intensities is \textbf{203} nT, implying that the estimated storm intensity deviates significantly from the observed one. The RMS error between the intensities estimated by Burton equation and the observed intensities is 130.8 nT. The relative error caused by Burton equation for the storms with intensities $Δ$SYM-H$<$-400 nT is larger than 27\%, implying that the absolute error will be large for the storms with $Δ$SYM-H$<$-400 nT. The results indicate that the two equations cannot work effectively in the estimation of GGSs. On the contrary, the intensity of a GGS estimated by the empirical formula created by \cite{WangCB2003} can always be very close to the observed one if we select the right weight for solar wind dynamic pressure, proving that solar wind dynamic pressure is an important factor for GGS intensity, but it is overlooked in the ring current injection terms of Burton equation or OM equation. This is the reason why the two equations cannot work effectively in the estimation of GGSs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Dependence of Intensities of Major Geomagnetic Storms (Dst $\le$ -100 nT) on Associated Solar Wind Parameters

A geomagnetic storm is the result of sustained interaction between solar wind with a southward magnetic field and the magnetosphere. To investigate the influence of various solar wind parameters on the intensity of major geomagnetic storm, 67 major geomagnetic storms that occurred between 1998 and 2006 were used to calculate the correlation coefficients (CCs) between the intensities of major geomagnetic storms and the time integrals of southward interplanetary magnetic field $B_s$, solar wind electric field ($E_y$) and injection function (Q) during the main phase of the associated geomagnetic storms. SYM-H$_{min}$ was used to indicate the intensity of the associated major geomagnetic storm, while I($B_z$), I($E_y$) and I(Q) were used to indicate the time integrals of $B_z$, $E_y$ and Q during the main phase of associated major geomagnetic storm respectively. The derived CC between I($B_z$) and SYM-H$_{min}$ is 0.33, while the CC between I($E_y$) and SYM-H$_{min}$ is 0.57 and the CC between I(Q) and SYM-H$_{min}$ is 0.86. The results provide statistical evidence that solar wind dynamic pressure or solar wind density plays a significant role in transferring solar wind energy into the magnetosphere, in addition to the southward magnetic field and solar wind speed. Solar wind that has a strong geoeffectiveness requires solar wind dynamic pressure $>$3 nPa or solar wind density $>3$ nPa$/V_{sw}^2$. Large and long duration $B_s$ alone cannot ensure a major geomagnetic storm, especially if the solar wind dynamic pressure is very low, as large and long duration Bs is not a full condition, only a necessary condition to trigger a major geomagnetic storm.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

A study on the dynamic spectral indices for SEP events on 2000 July 14 and 2005 January 20

We have studied the dynamic proton spectra for the two solar energetic particle (SEP) events on 2000 July 14 (hereafter GLE59) and 2005 January 20 (hereafter GLE69). The source locations of GLE59 and GLE69 are N22W07 and N12W58 respectively. Proton fluxes >30 MeV have been used to compute the dynamic spectral indices of the two SEP events. The results show that spectral indices of the two SEP events increased more swiftly at early times, suggesting that the proton fluxes >30 MeV might be accelerated particularly by the concurrent flares at early times for the two SEP events. For the GLE69 with source location at N12W58, both flare site and shock nose are well connected with the Earth at the earliest time. However, only the particles accelerated by the shock driven by eastern flank of the CME can propagate along the interplanetary magnetic field line to the Earth after the flare. For the GLE59 with source location at N22W07, only the particles accelerated by the shock driven by western flank of the associated CME can reach the Earth after the flare. Results show that there was slightly more than one hour during which the proton spectra for GLE69 are softer than that for GLE59 after the flares, suggesting that the shock driven by eastern flank of the CME associated with GLE69 is weaker than the shock driven by the western flank of the CME associated with GLE59. The results support that quasi-perpendicular shock has stronger potential in accelerating particles than the quasi-parallel shock. The results also suggest that only a small part of the shock driven by western flank of the CME associated with the GLE59 is quasi-perpendicular.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Sun-Earth connection Event of Super Geomagnetic Storm on March 31, 2001: the Importance of Solar Wind Density

An X1.7 flare at 10:15 UT and a halo CME with a projected speed of 942 km/s erupted from NOAA solar active region 9393 located at N20W19, were observed on 2001 March 29. When the CME reached the Earth, it triggered a super geomagnetic storm (hereafter super storm). We find that the CME always moved towards the Earth according to the intensity-time profiles of protons with different energies. The solar wind parameters responsible for the main phase of the super storm occurred on March 31, 2001 is analyzed taking into account the delayed geomagnetic effect of solar wind at the L1 point and using the SYM-H index. According to the variation properties of SYM-H index during the main phase of the super storm, the main phase of the super storm is divided into two parts. A comparative study of solar wind parameters responsible for the two parts shows the evidence that the solar wind density plays a significant role in transferring solar wind energy into the magnetosphere, besides the southward magnetic field and solar wind speed.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access