Source author record

Mihaly Molnar

Mihaly Molnar appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Rapid 14C excursion at 3372-3371 BCE not observed at two different locations, a comment on Wang et al. (2017)

Excursions in the carbon-14 record measured in tree rings are attributed to various high energy but short-lived cosmic effects. So far, rapid changes at 774-775 CE, 993-994 CE and 660 BCE have been convincingly interpreted as due to rapid changes in solar cosmic-ray flux, usually accredited with reproduction of the events in trees at different locations and different laboratories, and followed with equivalent peaks of other cosmogenic isotopes in polar ice cores. In 2017, Wang et al. proposed a new event at 3372-3371 BCE based on a single set of annual 14C data measured on a floating series of tree rings sampled from a buried specimen of Chinese wingnut tree (Pterocarya stenoptera). We attempted to reproduce this event in tree rings of an absolutely dated bristlecone pine specimen (Pinus longaeva) from the White Mountains, California USA and a subfossil European oak (Quercus sp.) from the Moselle River Valley in France. Unfortunately, we are unable to determine whether there is any rapid 14C excursion during this time, although the regular 11-year Schwabe cycle is clearly observable. Therefore, the presence of a cosmic-ray event as suggested at 3372-3371 BCE cannot be confirmed. It is possible the exposed 14C spike occurred at some other time, the absolute age of which we cannot determine unless the precise calendar age of the Chinese wingnut wood is properly crossdated, although the other data of Wang et al. (2017) is not inconsistent with our records. In either case, this is important because the frequency of such extreme cosmic events needs to be well-documented to assess the likelihood of similar high-energy effects occurring in the future.