Source author record

Michael Hardisty

Michael Hardisty appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Virtual-reality based patient-specific simulation of spine surgical procedures: A fast, highly automated and high-fidelity system for surgical education and planning

Surgical training involves didactic teaching, mentor-led learning, surgical skills laboratories, and direct exposure to surgery; however, increasing clinical pressures have limited operating room (OR) exposure. This work leverages virtual reality (VR) to provide a safe and immersive training environment. Existing VR training is often based on standardized scenarios not tailored to individual clinical cases. This study addresses this limitation using artificial intelligence (AI) based computer vision methods to generate patient-specific simulations from computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This study focuses on patient-specific spinal decompression simulation for spinal stenosis in a virtual operating room. The objectives were (1) automatic creation of 3D anatomical models and (2) VR simulation of spinal decompression procedures including laminectomy, disc resection, and foraminotomy. Model construction required multimodal fusion (registration) of CT and MRI and segmentation of relevant structures. Segmentation was evaluated using the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), and registration accuracy using Target Registration Error (TRE). Qualitative feedback was obtained from surgeons and trainees. High-fidelity patient-specific 3D models were generated efficiently (approximately 2.5 minutes per case, N = 15). Segmentation accuracy was high, with a DSC of 0.95 (+/- 0.03) for vertebral bone and 0.895 (+/- 0.02) for soft tissue structures. Registration accuracy showed a mean TRE of 1.73 (+/- 0.42) mm. Semi-structured interviews indicated improved spatial understanding, increased procedural confidence, and strong perceived educational value. This platform significantly reduced the time and costs of patient-specific modelling, thereby facilitating pre-operative planning, post-procedural assessments, and comprehensive surgical simulation.