Source author record

Michael Buergisser

Michael Buergisser appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
1topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2012arXiv

An acceleration procedure for optimal first-order methods

We introduce in this paper an optimal first-order method that allows an easy and cheap evaluation of the local Lipschitz constant of the objective's gradient. This constant must ideally be chosen at every iteration as small as possible, while serving in an indispensable upper bound for the value of the objective function. In the previously existing variants of optimal first-order methods, this upper bound inequality was constructed from points computed during the current iteration. It was thus not possible to select the optimal value for this Lipschitz constant at the beginning of the iteration. In our variant, the upper bound inequality is constructed from points available before the current iteration, offering us the possibility to set the Lipschitz constant to its optimal value at once. This procedure, even if efficient in practice, presents a higher worse-case complexity than standard optimal first-order methods. We propose an alternative strategy that retains the practical efficiency of this procedure, while having an optimal worse-case complexity. We show how our generic scheme can be adapted for smoothing techniques, and perform numerical experiments on large scale eigenvalue minimization problems. As compared with standard optimal first-order methods, our schemes allows us to divide computation times by two to three orders of magnitude for the largest problems we considered.