Researcher profile

Michael Brunner

Michael Brunner contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 11 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
1works
0followers
1topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Risk Management Practices in Information Security: Exploring the Status Quo in the DACH Region

Information security management aims at ensuring proper protection of information values and information processing systems (i.e. assets). Information security risk management techniques are incorporated to deal with threats and vulnerabilities that impose risks to information security properties of these assets. This paper investigates the current state of risk management practices being used in information security management in the DACH region (Germany, Austria, Switzerland). We used an anonymous online survey targeting strategic and operative information security and risk managers and collected data from 26 organizations. We analyzed general practices, documentation artifacts, patterns of stakeholder collaboration as well as tool types and data sources used by enterprises to conduct information security management activities. Our findings show that the state of practice of information security risk management is in need of improvement. Current industrial practice heavily relies on manual data collection and complex potentially subjective decision processes with multiple stakeholders involved. Dedicated risk management tools and methods are used selectively and neglected in favor of general-purpose documentation tools and direct communication between stakeholders. In light of our results we propose guidelines for the development of risk management practices that are better aligned with the current operational situation in information security management.