BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Michał Włodarczyk

Michał Włodarczyk contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Data Structures and AlgorithmsComputational Complexity

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
2topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Protrusion Decompositions Revisited: Uniform Lossy Kernels for Reducing Treewidth and Linear Kernels for Hitting Disconnected Minors

Let F be a finite family of graphs. In the F-Deletion problem, one is given a graph G and an integer k, and the goal is to find k vertices whose deletion results in a graph with no minor from the family F. This may be regarded as a far-reaching generalization of Vertex Cover and Feedback vertex Set. In their seminal work, Fomin, Lokshtanov, Misra & Saurabh [FOCS 2012] gave a polynomial kernel for this problem when the family F contains a planar graph. As the size of their kernel is g(F) * k^{f(F)}, a natural follow-up question was whether the dependence on F in the exponent of k can be avoided. The answer turned out to be negative: Giannapoulou, Jansen, Lokshtanov & Saurabh [TALG 2017] proved that this is already inevitable for the special case of the Treewidth-d-Deletion problem. In this work, we show that this non-uniformity can be avoided at the expense of a small loss. First, we present a simple 2-approximate kernelization algorithm for Treewidth-d-Deletion with kernel size g(d) * k^5. Next, we show that the approximation factor can be made arbitrarily close to 1, if we settle for a kernelization protocol with O(1) calls to an oracle that solves instances of size bounded by a uniform polynomial in k. We also obtain linear kernels on sparse graph classes when F contains a planar graph, whereas the previously known theorems required all graphs in F to be connected. Specifically, we generalize the kernelization algorithm by Kim, Langer, Paul, Reidl, Rossmanith, Sau & Sikdar [TALG 2015] on graph classes that exclude a topological minor.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Lossy Planarization: A Constant-Factor Approximate Kernelization for Planar Vertex Deletion

In the F-minor-free deletion problem we want to find a minimum vertex set in a given graph that intersects all minor models of graphs from the family F. The Vertex planarization problem is a special case of F-minor-free deletion for the family F = {K_5, K_{3,3}}. Whenever the family F contains at least one planar graph, then F-minor-free deletion is known to admit a constant-factor approximation algorithm and a polynomial kernelization [Fomin, Lokshtanov, Misra, and Saurabh, FOCS&#39;12]. The Vertex planarization problem is arguably the simplest setting for which F does not contain a planar graph and the existence of a constant-factor approximation or a polynomial kernelization remains a major open problem. In this work we show that Vertex planarization admits an algorithm which is a combination of both approaches. Namely, we present a polynomial A-approximate kernelization, for some constant A > 1, based on the framework of lossy kernelization [Lokshtanov, Panolan, Ramanujan, and Saurabh, STOC&#39;17]. Simply speaking, when given a graph G and integer k, we show how to compute a graph G&#39; on poly(k) vertices so that any B-approximate solution to G&#39; can be lifted to an (A*B)-approximate solution to G, as long as A*B*OPT(G) <= k. In order to achieve this, we develop a framework for sparsification of planar graphs which approximately preserves all separators and near-separators between subsets of the given terminal set. Our result yields an improvement over the state-of-art approximation algorithms for Vertex planarization. The problem admits a polynomial-time O(n^eps)-approximation algorithm, for any eps > 0, and a quasi-polynomial-time (log n)^O(1) approximation algorithm, both randomized [Kawarabayashi and Sidiropoulos, FOCS&#39;17]. By pipelining these algorithms with our approximate kernelization, we improve the approximation factors to respectively O(OPT^eps) and (log OPT)^O(1).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Vertex Deletion Parameterized by Elimination Distance and Even Less

We study the parameterized complexity of various classic vertex-deletion problems such as Odd cycle transversal, Vertex planarization, and Chordal vertex deletion under hybrid parameterizations. Existing FPT algorithms for these problems either focus on the parameterization by solution size, detecting solutions of size $k$ in time $f(k) \cdot n^{O(1)}$, or width parameterizations, finding arbitrarily large optimal solutions in time $f(w) \cdot n^{O(1)}$ for some width measure $w$ like treewidth. We unify these lines of research by presenting FPT algorithms for parameterizations that can simultaneously be arbitrarily much smaller than the solution size and the treewidth. We consider two classes of parameterizations which are relaxations of either treedepth of treewidth. They are related to graph decompositions in which subgraphs that belong to a target class H (e.g., bipartite or planar) are considered simple. First, we present a framework for computing approximately optimal decompositions for miscellaneous classes H. Namely, if the cost of an optimal decomposition is $k$, we show how to find a decomposition of cost $k^{O(1)}$ in time $f(k) \cdot n^{O(1)}$. This is applicable to any graph class H for which the corresponding vertex-deletion problem admits a constant-factor approximation algorithm or an FPT algorithm paramaterized by the solution size. Secondly, we exploit the constructed decompositions for solving vertex-deletion problems by extending ideas from algorithms using iterative compression and the finite state property. For the three mentioned vertex-deletion problems, and all problems which can be formulated as hitting a finite set of connected forbidden (a) minors or (b) (induced) subgraphs, we obtain FPT algorithms with respect to both studied parameterizations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Optimal polynomial-time compression for Boolean Max CSP

In the Boolean maximum constraint satisfaction problem - Max CSP$(Γ)$ - one is given a collection of weighted applications of constraints from a finite constraint language $Γ$, over a common set of variables, and the goal is to assign Boolean values to the variables so that the total weight of satisfied constraints is maximized. There exists an elegant dichotomy theorem providing a criterion on $Γ$ for the problem to be polynomial-time solvable and stating that otherwise it becomes NP-hard. We study the NP hard cases through the lens of kernelization and provide a complete characterization of Max CSP$(Γ)$ with respect to the optimal compression size. Namely, we prove that Max CSP$(Γ)$ parameterized by the number of variables $n$ is either polynomial-time solvable, or there exists an integer $d \ge 2$ depending on $Γ$, such that 1. An instance of \textsc{Max CSP$(Γ)$} can be compressed into an equivalent instance with $O(n^d\log n)$ bits in polynomial time, 2. Max CSP$(Γ)$ does not admit such a compression to $O(n^{d-ε})$ bits unless $\text{NP} \subseteq \text{co-NP} / \text{poly}$. Our reductions are based on interpreting constraints as multilinear polynomials combined with the framework of constraint implementations. As another application of our reductions, we reveal tight connections between optimal running times for solving Max CSP$(Γ)$. More precisely, we show that obtaining a running time of the form $O(2^{(1-ε)n})$ for particular classes of Max CSPs is as hard as breaching this barrier for Max $d$-SAT for some $d$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Parameterized inapproximability for Steiner Orientation by Gap Amplification

In the $k$-Steiner Orientation problem, we are given a mixed graph, that is, with both directed and undirected edges, and a set of $k$ terminal pairs. The goal is to find an orientation of the undirected edges that maximizes the number of terminal pairs for which there is a path from the source to the sink. The problem is known to be W[1]-hard when parameterized by k and hard to approximate up to some constant for FPT algorithms assuming Gap-ETH. On the other hand, no approximation factor better than $O(k)$ is known. We show that $k$-Steiner Orientation is unlikely to admit an approximation algorithm with any constant factor, even within FPT running time. To obtain this result, we construct a self-reduction via a hashing-based gap amplification technique, which turns out useful even outside of the FPT paradigm. Precisely, we rule out any approximation factor of the form $(\log k)^{o(1)}$ for FPT algorithms (assuming FPT $\ne$ W[1]) and $(\log n)^{o(1)}$ for~purely polynomial-time algorithms (assuming that the class W[1] does not admit randomized FPT algorithms). Moreover, we prove $k$-Steiner Orientation to belong to W[1], which entails W[1]-completeness of $(\log k)^{o(1)}$-approximation for $k$-Steiner Orientation This provides an example of a natural approximation task that is complete in a parameterized complexity class. Finally, we apply our technique to the maximization version of directed multicut - Max $(k,p)$-Directed Multicut - where we are given a directed graph, $k$ terminals pairs, and a budget $p$. The goal is to maximize the number of separated terminal pairs by removing $p$ edges. We present a simple proof that the problem admits no FPT approximation with factor $O(k^{\frac 1 2 - ε})$ (assuming FPT $\ne$ W[1]) and no polynomial-time approximation with ratio $O(|E(G)|^{\frac 1 2 - ε})$ (assuming NP $\not\subseteq$ co-RP).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access