BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Mengdi Li

Mengdi Li appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Computation and LanguageComputer Vision

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Can Large Language Models Identify Implicit Suicidal Ideation? An Empirical Evaluation

We present a comprehensive evaluation framework for assessing Large Language Models' (LLMs) capabilities in suicide prevention, focusing on two critical aspects: the Identification of Implicit Suicidal ideation (IIS) and the Provision of Appropriate Supportive responses (PAS). We introduce \ourdata, a novel dataset of 1,308 test cases built upon psychological frameworks including D/S-IAT and Negative Automatic Thinking, alongside real-world scenarios. Through extensive experiments with 8 widely used LLMs under different contextual settings, we find that current models struggle significantly with detecting implicit suicidal ideation and providing appropriate support, highlighting crucial limitations in applying LLMs to mental health contexts. Our findings underscore the need for more sophisticated approaches in developing and evaluating LLMs for sensitive psychological applications.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2026arXiv

StateVLM: A State-Aware Vision-Language Model for Robotic Affordance Reasoning

Vision-language models (VLMs) have shown remarkable performance in various robotic tasks, as they can perceive visual information and understand natural language instructions. However, when applied to robotics, VLMs remain subject to a fundamental limitation inherent in large language models (LLMs): they struggle with numerical reasoning, particularly in object detection and object-state localization. To explore numerical reasoning as a regression task in VLMs, we propose a novel training strategy to adapt VLMs for object detection and object-state localization. This approach leverages box decoder outputs to compute an Auxiliary Regression Loss (ARL) during fine-tuning, while preserving standard sequence prediction at inference. We leverage this training strategy to develop StateVLM (State-aware Vision-Language Model), a novel model designed to perceive and learn fine-grained object representations, including precise localization of objects and their states, as well as graspable regions. Due to the lack of a benchmark for object-state affordance reasoning, we introduce an open-source benchmark, Object State Affordance Reasoning (OSAR), which contains 1,172 scenes with 7,746 individual objects and corresponding bounding boxes. Comparative experiments on adapted benchmarks (RefCOCO, RefCOCO+, and \mbox{RefCOCOg}) demonstrate that ARL improves model performance by an average of 1.6\% compared to models without ARL. Experiments on the OSAR benchmark further support this finding, showing that StateVLM with ARL achieves an average of 5.2\% higher performance than models without ARL. In particular, ARL is also important for the complex task of affordance reasoning in OSAR, where it enhances the consistency of model outputs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access