Researcher profile

Melanie Veale

Melanie Veale contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - Baseline
3works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2016arXiv

The MASSIVE Survey - V. Spatially-Resolved Stellar Angular Momentum, Velocity Dispersion, and Higher Moments of the 41 Most Massive Local Early-Type Galaxies

We present spatially-resolved two-dimensional stellar kinematics for the 41 most massive early-type galaxies (MK <~ -25.7 mag, stellar mass M* >~ 10^11.8 Msun) of the volume-limited (D < 108 Mpc) MASSIVE survey. For each galaxy, we obtain high-quality spectra in the wavelength range of 3650 to 5850 A from the 246-fiber Mitchell integral-field spectrograph (IFS) at McDonald Observatory, covering a 107&#34; x 107&#34; field of view (often reaching 2 to 3 effective radii). We measure the 2-D spatial distribution of each galaxy&#39;s angular momentum (lambda and fast or slow rotator status), velocity dispersion (sigma), and higher-order non-Gaussian velocity features (Gauss-Hermite moments h3 to h6). Our sample contains a high fraction (~80% ) of slow and non-rotators with lambda <~ 0.2. When combined with the lower-mass ETGs in the ATLAS3D survey, we find the fraction of slow-rotators to increase dramatically with galaxy mass, reaching ~50% at MK ~ -25.5 mag and ~90% at MK <~ -26 mag. All of our fast rotators show a clear anti-correlation between h3 and V/sigma, and the slope of the anti-correlation is steeper in more round galaxies. The radial profiles of sigma show a clear luminosity and environmental dependence: the 12 most luminous galaxies in our sample (MK <~ -26 mag) are all brightest cluster/group galaxies (except NGC 4874) and all have rising or nearly flat sigma profiles, whereas five of the seven &#34;isolated&#34; galaxies are all fainter than MK = -25.8 mag and have falling sigma. All of our galaxies have positive average h4; the most luminous galaxies have average h4 ~ 0.05 while less luminous galaxies have a range of values between 0 and 0.05. Most of our galaxies show positive radial gradients in h4, and those galaxies also tend to have rising sigma profiles. We discuss the implications for the relationship among dynamical mass, sigma, h4, and velocity anisotropy for these massive galaxies.

preprint2016arXiv

The MASSIVE Survey IV.: The X-ray halos of the most massive early-type galaxies in the nearby Universe

Studies of the physical properties of local elliptical galaxies (e.g., gas temperatures, halo masses, stellar kinematics) are shedding new light on galaxy formation. Here we present the hot X-ray gas properties of 33 early-type systems within the MASSIVE galaxy survey sample that have archival Chandra X-ray observations. Through careful X-ray spectral modeling, we derive X-ray luminosities (L_X) and plasma temperatures (T_gas) for the diffuse gas components in these galaxies. We combine the MASSIVE sample with 41 galaxies from the ATLAS^3D survey to investigate the X-ray and optical properties of a statistically significant sample of nearby early-type galaxies across a wide-range of environments. We deduce that all early-type galaxies (independent of galaxy mass and rotational support) follow a universal scaling law such that L_X~T_gas^4.5. When X-ray measurements are performed consistently in apertures set by the galaxy stellar content, the wide-scale environment does not contribute to the intrinsic scatter (~0.5dex) within the scaling relation. We further demonstrate that the scatter in L_X around both K-band luminosity (L_K) and the galaxy stellar velocity dispersion is primarily driven by T_gas, with no clear trends with halo mass, radio power, or angular momentum of the stars. It is not trivial to tie the origin of the gas directly to either the stellar mass or the galaxy potential. Indeed, our data require a steeper relation between L_X, L_K, and sigma_e than predicted by standard mass-loss models. Finally, we find a statistically significant correlation between sigma_e and T_gas, suggesting that T_gas is set by the galaxy potential inside the optical effective radius. We conclude that within the inner-most 10-30kpc region, early-types maintain pressure-supported hot gas, with a minimum T_gas set by the virial temperature, but the majority show evidence for some additional heating.

preprint2014arXiv

Comparing Simple Quasar Demographics Models

This paper explores several simple model variations for the connections among quasars, galaxies, and dark matter halos for redshifts 1 < z < 6. A key component of these models is that we enforce a self-consistent black hole (BH) history by tracking both BH mass and BH growth rate at all redshifts. We connect objects across redshift with a simple constant-number-density procedure, and choose a fiducial model with a relationship between BH and galaxy growth rates that is linear and evolves in a simple way with redshift. Within this fiducial model, we find the quasar luminosity function (QLF) by calculating an &#34;intrinsic&#34; luminosity based on either the BH mass or BH growth rate, and then choosing a model of quasar variability with either a lognormal or truncated power-law distribution of instantaneous luminosities. This gives four model variations, which we fit to the observed QLF at each redshift. With the best-fit models in hand, we undertake a detailed comparison of the four fiducial models, and explore changes to our fiducial model of the BH-galaxy relationship. Each model variation can successfully fit the observed QLF, the shape of which is generally set by the &#34;intrinsic&#34; luminosity at the faint end and by the scatter due to variability at the bright end. We focus on accounting for the reasons that physically different models can make such similar predictions, and on identifying what observational data or physical arguments are most essential in breaking the degeneracies among models.